2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction: Factors influencing the behaviour and perceptions of Australian veterinarians towards antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of our respondents’ decision to prescribe was not influenced by the clients which is a good indication as our animal health workers will not be under pressure to prescribe in cases where antibiotics are not required. This finding was similar to studies from the US [ 22 ] and Australia [ 23 ]. This would prevent unnecessary prescription of antibiotic for a disease under the pressure of the clients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of our respondents’ decision to prescribe was not influenced by the clients which is a good indication as our animal health workers will not be under pressure to prescribe in cases where antibiotics are not required. This finding was similar to studies from the US [ 22 ] and Australia [ 23 ]. This would prevent unnecessary prescription of antibiotic for a disease under the pressure of the clients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similar to many other studies [23][24][25], oxytetracycline, tetracycline and penicillin were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics in animals in Bhutan. This could be due to their availability, familiarity among the animal health workers, and the disease prevalence in the country.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As much as two hundred four clinical practitioner vet who officially registered in Bali divided into two group based on the animal they handle the most namely pet veterinarian and livestock vet. Both of groups were asked to answer a Likert-type scale questionnaire that had been described by Norris et al, (2019) with minor modification. The Kruskal-Wallis H test in IBM SPSS software was performed to determine significant differences in median responses and mean ratings between different veterinary groups for each question.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rancangan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah rancangan studi crosssectional berupa survei yang sebelumnya sudah dideskripsikan oleh Norris et al, (2019).…”
Section: Rancangan Penelitianunclassified