2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction: Large-scale molecular phylogeny, morphology, divergence-time estimation, and the fossil record of advanced caenophidian snakes (Squamata: Serpentes)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
8
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aside from the addition of L. obscuriventris, the phylogenetic reconstruction of Lycodonomorphus yielded identical topological structuring when compared to past publications (Kelly et al 2011;Vidal et al 2008;Zaher et al 2019). Whilst only a single sample was available, the strong phylogenetic support (ML and BI) coupled with the divergent pairwise distance values separating L. obscuriventris from its congeners ratified the assertions of Broadley (1995) that the species is valid.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aside from the addition of L. obscuriventris, the phylogenetic reconstruction of Lycodonomorphus yielded identical topological structuring when compared to past publications (Kelly et al 2011;Vidal et al 2008;Zaher et al 2019). Whilst only a single sample was available, the strong phylogenetic support (ML and BI) coupled with the divergent pairwise distance values separating L. obscuriventris from its congeners ratified the assertions of Broadley (1995) that the species is valid.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The phylogenetic work that has included Lycodonomorphus spp. mainly focussed on the higher-level taxonomy (Pyron, Burbrink & Wiens 2013;Vidal et al 2008;Zaher et al 2019) and other closely related genera within Lamprophiidae such as Lamprophis, Boaedon and file snakes (Branch et al 2019;Broadley et al 2018;Ceríaco et al 2021;Greenbaum et al 2015;Hallermann et al 2020;Keates et al 2019;Kelly et al 2008Kelly et al , 2011. Only limited representative sampling has been used for members of Lycodonomorphus, meaning only four of the nine species have been sequenced.…”
Section: Aim and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is strong evidence that early evolution of pitvipers occurred in Asia during the Eocene and that they reached the Americas through a single colonization event via the Bering land bridge in the Oligocene/Miocene (Parkinson, 1999;Parkinson et al, 2002;W€ uster et al, 2002, 2008Alencar et al, 2016). The hypothesis of a single colonization event is supported by the monophyly of New World pitvipers, shown repeatedly in phylogenetic analyses (Kraus et al, 1996;Vidal et al, 1997Vidal et al, , 1999Vidal and Lecointre, 1998;Parkinson, 1999;Parkinson et al, 2002;W€ uster et al, 2002, 2008Malhotra et al, 2010;Fenwick, 2012;Fenwick et al, 2012;Pyron et al, 2013;Alencar et al, 2016;Figueroa et al, 2016;Zaher et al, 2019). Subsequent to this colonization event, pitvipers would have undergone rapid adaptive radiation (Martins et al, 2001;Gutberlet Jr and Harvey, 2002;Martins et al, 2002;W€ uster et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The common ancestor of Lachesis appeared around 7 mya, while the Centroamerican clade (L. melanocephala + L. stenophrys) diverged about 3 mya and the South American clade (L. acrochorda + L. muta) about 1 mya, suggesting a Mesoamerican origin of the genus, contrary to the idea that Lachesis had a South American origin (Ripa 1999). Unfortunately, neither Alencar et al (2016) nor Zaher et al (2019) examined specimens from the Brazilian Atlantic forest; consequently, the synonymy of Fernandes et al (2004) must still be tested.…”
Section: Reptiles and Amphibians C O N S E R V At I O N A N D N At U R A L H I S T O R Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the most recent genetic phylogenies of the Viperidae (Alencar et al 2016;Zaher et al 2019), Lachesis appeared as basal in the subclade Lachesis + Ophryacus + Mixcoatlus + Bothriechis and sister to the subclade Agkistrodon + Sistrurus + Crotalus in the subfamily Crotalinae). The common ancestor of Lachesis appeared around 7 mya, while the Centroamerican clade (L. melanocephala + L. stenophrys) diverged about 3 mya and the South American clade (L. acrochorda + L. muta) about 1 mya, suggesting a Mesoamerican origin of the genus, contrary to the idea that Lachesis had a South American origin (Ripa 1999).…”
Section: Reptiles and Amphibians C O N S E R V At I O N A N D N At U R A L H I S T O R Ymentioning
confidence: 99%