2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28080-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of a Factor VIII genomic inversion with designer-recombinases

Abstract: Despite advances in nuclease-based genome editing technologies, correcting human disease-causing genomic inversions remains a challenge. Here, we describe the potential use of a recombinase-based system to correct the 140 kb inversion of the F8 gene frequently found in patients diagnosed with severe Hemophilia A. Employing substrate-linked directed molecular evolution, we develop a coupled heterodimeric recombinase system (RecF8) achieving 30% inversion of the target sequence in human tissue culture cells. Tra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the main difference between the two vector designs is the relative location of the strong constitutive promoter, it is reasonable to assume that it is the ‘upstream’ location of this promoter that makes the positive reporter configuration less recombinationally active. The promoter location differently affects the topology of DNA upstream and downstream of a transcription bubble: DNA is overwound downstream of the bubble while it is underwound upstream of it ( 24 ). Since in the experiments with the negative reporter (in which the 5′ recombination target likely experiences underwinding) Int was able to generate the correct recombination outcome with all recombination pairs tested, we hypothesize that it is the recombination target underwinding that positively affects the recombination efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the main difference between the two vector designs is the relative location of the strong constitutive promoter, it is reasonable to assume that it is the ‘upstream’ location of this promoter that makes the positive reporter configuration less recombinationally active. The promoter location differently affects the topology of DNA upstream and downstream of a transcription bubble: DNA is overwound downstream of the bubble while it is underwound upstream of it ( 24 ). Since in the experiments with the negative reporter (in which the 5′ recombination target likely experiences underwinding) Int was able to generate the correct recombination outcome with all recombination pairs tested, we hypothesize that it is the recombination target underwinding that positively affects the recombination efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calcium serum levels were raised as a result of thyroid hormone problems. Enhanced blood calcium concentration stimulates calcitonin secretion [4], which appears to be the cause of increased calcitonin cytoplasmic reactivity in parafollicular cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small C cells, also known as parafollicular cells, are found between thyroid follicles and secrete polypeptide hormone known as calcitonin. Calcitonin secretion is triggered by a rise in serum calcium levels, and calcitonin protects against hypercalcemia [4]. Calcium is necessary for various intracellular and extracellular activities as well as skeletal support in the body [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By simultaneously capturing the target site sequence with the enzyme sequence on the same DNA fragment, the DNA editing rate for each enzyme variant can be quantified. We demonstrate the applicability of this platform on two different DNA editing systems, namely designer-recombinases [ 5 , 10 – 15 ] and evolved Cas12f-derived [ 16 19 ] mini-ABEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%