2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction: Publication reform to safeguard wildlife from researcher harm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many traditional wild animal monitoring methods have been widely used [16,17], including surveys [5][6][7], tracking [8][9][10][11], sampling [12][13][14][15], and so on. All of these methods are labor intensive, especially for investigating rare wild animals such as giant pandas [45].…”
Section: Intelligent Wildlife Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many traditional wild animal monitoring methods have been widely used [16,17], including surveys [5][6][7], tracking [8][9][10][11], sampling [12][13][14][15], and so on. All of these methods are labor intensive, especially for investigating rare wild animals such as giant pandas [45].…”
Section: Intelligent Wildlife Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers and wildlife management agencies in many countries are monitoring animals in the wild for conservation purposes as animal diversity is declining at an unprecedented rate [3,4]. Conventionally, animal monitoring is studied by human experts who gather data through surveys [5][6][7], tracking [8][9][10][11], sampling [12][13][14][15], and other observational ways [16,17]. However, there are significant labor and time costs associated with these traditional methods [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%