2010
DOI: 10.1371/annotation/7f0b174d-ab93-4844-8305-1de22836aab8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction: The Neural Correlates of Religious and Nonreligious Belief

Abstract: Background: While religious faith remains one of the most significant features of human life, little is known about its relationship to ordinary belief at the level of the brain. Nor is it known whether religious believers and nonbelievers differ in how they evaluate statements of fact. Our lab previously has used functional neuroimaging to study belief as a general mode of cognition [1], and others have looked specifically at religious belief [2]. However, no research has compared these two states of mind dir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, it has been found that certain aspects of religious and nonreligious beliefs share common neural underpinnings (Howlett & Paulus, 2015;Leshinskaya et al, 2017) and, perhaps not surprisingly, that religious beliefs recruit areas responsible for semantic storage, processing and retrieval (Berns et al, 2012). On the other hand, there have also been detectable differences in the brain activation patterns between religious and nonreligious beliefs (Harris et al, 2010) as well as in some social processing mechanisms (Huang & Han, 2014;Schjoedt et al, 2011;Thiruchselvam et al, 2017). Religious experiences appear to be interpersonal events where the mind of a deity or supernatural agent is believed to be involved.…”
Section: Large-scale Brain Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, it has been found that certain aspects of religious and nonreligious beliefs share common neural underpinnings (Howlett & Paulus, 2015;Leshinskaya et al, 2017) and, perhaps not surprisingly, that religious beliefs recruit areas responsible for semantic storage, processing and retrieval (Berns et al, 2012). On the other hand, there have also been detectable differences in the brain activation patterns between religious and nonreligious beliefs (Harris et al, 2010) as well as in some social processing mechanisms (Huang & Han, 2014;Schjoedt et al, 2011;Thiruchselvam et al, 2017). Religious experiences appear to be interpersonal events where the mind of a deity or supernatural agent is believed to be involved.…”
Section: Large-scale Brain Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observaron que las zonas de recompensa se activan de manera mucho más intensa con chistes o juegos de palabras que con frases comunes y la respuesta es proporcional a lo divertido que los sujetos encuentran cada uno de los chistes. 53 Durante un estudio de resonancia magnética funcional 54 15 voluntarios cristianos y 15 no creyentes, se pronunciaron sobre la verdad o falsedad de locuciones tanto religiosas (ejemplo: "los ángeles existen") como no religiosas ("Alejandro Magno fue un famoso caudillo militar"). Las imágenes cerebrales de los creyentes y no creyentes eran indistinguibles, lo que sugiere que la evaluación de verdad o falsedad es independiente de su contenido.…”
unclassified