Correction to: 3D printed bone models in oral and craniomaxillofacial surgery: a systematic review

Abstract

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Quality and haptic feedback of three-dimensionally printed models for simulating dental implant surgery

“…18 On the contrary, MJ-based printers are generally able to replicate the model more precisely with finer layer resolution. 10 In relation to drilling perception, the MJ-based model with acrylic-based resin achieved the highest score, but none of the models were able to offer resistance comparable with that of real bone. Additionally, SLA was identified as being better for drilling than the DLP-based model, possibly because of the polymerization process.…”

“…Apart from technology, an adequate tactile sensation also depends on the mechanical properties of the material, including the Young modulus and hardness, which impact the drilling force. 10,19 All models included in this study had a Young modulus below the 3000-MPa value of mandibular bone. 29 The MJ-based model with acrylic resin showed the closest modulus to that of real bone, which might have further enhanced its capability for achieving a higher haptic feedback than the other models.…”

“…4,8,9 Three-dimensional (3D) printing has allowed the production of visuo-haptic patient-specific models to be used for both medical education and craniomaxillofacial surgical training. [10][11][12][13][14] The application of 3D-printed patient-specific models for rehearsing complex maxillofacial procedures has been reported to reduce operation and bleeding time and to improve clinical outcomes. 15,16 In addition, 3D-printed models can enhanced a clinician's comprehension of anatomic structures, thereby improving treatment delivery and patient care.…”

Can Steam Sterilization Affect the Accuracy of Point-of-Care 3D Printed Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Customized Cranial Implants? An Investigative Analysis

“…Several hospitals worldwide have integrated in-house 3D printing into their daily clinical practices to provide personalized patient care. These studies have discussed point-of-care (POC) 3D printing for various applications, including creating anatomical biomodels for preoperative planning, intraoperative visualization, and pre-bending standard stock implants for simple and complex procedures [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. In addition, biocompatible 3D printing materials have also made it possible to develop surgical instruments and devices, such as contouring templates, surgical guides, and implant sizing models.…”

Anterolateral thigh perforator flap made by customized 3D-printing fabrication of fixed positioning guide for oromaxillofacial reconstruction: a preliminary study

“…Nowadays, digital medical technology and computer-aided medical procedure are increasingly being applied in the field of craniomaxillofacial reconstruction surgery, particularly the application of digital design combined with three-dimensional printing ( 9 ). Based on this novel technique, we proposed this computed tomography angiography (CTA)-aided 3D printing template to the reconstruction of defects of oral and maxillofacial region, so as to support technically in personalized and precise repair with septocutaneous artery flap.…”