Correction to: Effect of whole-body vibration on freezing and flexibility in Parkinson’s disease—a pilot study

Dincher, Andrea; Becker, Paula; Wydra, Georg

doi:10.1007/s10072-021-05464-z

Cited by 2 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Vibration 2023, 6, FOR PEER REVIEW 5 Effects range from −1.25 on 360° left turn at 18 Hz favoring the experimental group, to 0.41 on medio-lateral CoP at 12 Hz in Dincher and Wydra (2021) [30] favoring the control group. The total effect for balance shows a value of −0.21, for freezing −0.89, and reaction −0.45, all favoring the experimental group.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The different effect sizes for the individual parameters here range from "no effect" (ellipse of CoP sway, medio-lateral CoP, Sit and Reach) to "strong effect" (360 • turn). For the ellipse of CoP sway, for the anterior-posterior displacement of the CoP, as well as for Sit and Reach, 360 • turn and the ruler drop test, the strongest effects are obtained when 18 Hz is applied [30]. This could be attributed to the 18 Hz group being younger on average than the other groups or having a lower Hoehn and Yahr stage.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…The studies or subgroups with a single application can be regarded as homogeneous or only very slightly heterogeneous due to their low I 2 . However, these are mainly pilot studies with small sample sizes [28][29][30] in which different frequencies are investigated for their effectiveness. The different effect sizes for the individual parameters here range from "no effect" (ellipse of CoP sway, medio-lateral CoP, Sit and Reach) to "strong effect" (360 • turn).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In total, 16 studies were found that reached a total PEDro score of five or higher. Six of them investigated a single session of WBV [13,18,[28][29][30]33], the rest investigated multiple sessions. Seven of the studies found investigated randomized WBV [3,13,18,19,33,35,37], the rest investigated WBV without noise.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Seven of the studies found investigated randomized WBV [3,13,18,19,33,35,37], the rest investigated WBV without noise. The total time of treatment ranged from 300 s [13,18,[28][29][30]33] to 54,000 s [36]. Only three studies had a real control group without intervention [13,18,33], used a placebo treatment [3,19,26,[28][29][30][34][35][36][37], while the rest investigated WBV compared to a conventional treatment.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Effects of a Single Session of Whole Body Vibration Compared to Multiple Sessions—An Updated Review and Meta-Analysis

Dincher

2023

Vibration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Parkinson’s disease is an incurable neurological disease. Only the symptoms can be treated with medication or exercise therapy. The present analysis is intended to show how whole-body vibration training affects the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease, distinguishing between acute and long-term effects. Methods: online databases (EMBASE, PubMed, PEDro) were searched for reviews, meta-analyses and new studies since the previous most recent review/meta-analysis. Studies with at least a medium methodological quality (PEDro score at least 5 points) were selected. Results were presented as forest plots that indicated standardized mean differences with 95% confidence interval. Results: Sixteen studies were found with a PEDro-score of at least 5 points. Of these, three studies were excluded from the qualitative analysis because the necessary data, such as standard deviation or control group results, were missing. The effect sizes are very mixed. In some parameters there is no effect, in others a very strong effect. The effects in the comparison between single and multiple treatments are similar. Discussion: The different effects may be partly due to the different vibration frequencies or sentence durations, as well as to different valid test procedures. Conclusions: Since the study situation still does not show clear results, further studies must follow that compare different frequencies, sentence durations and vibration types with each other, so that training recommendations can be given on this basis.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Effects of a Single Session of Whole Body Vibration Compared to Multiple Sessions—An Updated Review and Meta-Analysis

Dincher

2023

Vibration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Pilot Interventional Study on Feasibility and Effectiveness of the CUE1 device in Parkinson’s disease

Azoidou,

Rowsell,

Camboe

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Current treatments for patients with Parkinson's disease (PwP) can fail to address gait disturbance and falls, which in turn affect quality of life (QoL). The CUE1 device delivers cueing with vibrotactile stimulation showing potential to alleviate motor symptoms and reduce falls based on preliminary user testing results. Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of CUE1 and its effect on motor and non-motor symptoms in PwP. Methods: PwP used the CUE1 for 9-weeks and were assessed at week 0, 3, 6, and 9 on MDS-UPDRS Part-III, Timed Up and Go (TUG), TUG with dual task (DT), Functional Gait Assessment (FGA), and Bradykinesia Akinesia Incoordination (BRAIN) test. Patients reported outcomes through MDS-UPDRS Part-I, -II, and -IV and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Results: Ten PwP (5 females, age range: 46-80; disease duration: 3-9 years) completed the CUE1 intervention with 100% compliance and no adverse events. CUE1 comfort and usability were rated highly (80%). Immediate CUE1 effect was observed on MDS-UPDRS-III 45.40+/-12.22 vs 39.60+/-11.74, p=0.008), TUG(11.53+/-1.92 vs 11.08+/-1.94, p=0.022), TUG DT(18.57+/-5.75 vs 17.61+/-6.28, p=0.037) and FGA(16.40+/-3.86 vs 18.60+/-3.92, p=0.007). Cumulative effect was noted on MDS-UPDRS-III(45.40+/-12.22 vs 27.80+/-12.32, p=0.005), FGA(18.60+/-3.92 vs 23.10+/-2.85, p<0.001), TUG DT(18.57+/-5.75 vs 13.58+/-7.05, p=0.031), BRAIN kinesia (45.10+/-14.39 vs 42.10+/-12.74, p<0.001) and incoordination (24331.09+/-38017.46 vs 14059.91+/-9030.96, p=0.016) scores, PSQI(10.10+/-4.95 vs 6.90+/-3.81, p=0.002), MDS-UPDRS-I(18.60+/-6.75 vs 12.20+/-3.68, p=0.011), MDS-UPDRS-II(17.30+/-7.29 vs 11.90+/-8.67, p=0.002), and MDS-UPDRS-IV(7.50+/-3.75 vs 3.40+/-2.95, p=0.003). Conclusion: In this unblinded, feasibility study, cueing with the CUE1 appeared to be a feasible and safe intervention for PwP improving motor and non-motor features.

show abstract

Correction to: Effect of whole-body vibration on freezing and flexibility in Parkinson’s disease—a pilot study

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Effects of a Single Session of Whole Body Vibration Compared to Multiple Sessions—An Updated Review and Meta-Analysis

Effects of a Single Session of Whole Body Vibration Compared to Multiple Sessions—An Updated Review and Meta-Analysis

A Pilot Interventional Study on Feasibility and Effectiveness of the CUE1 device in Parkinson’s disease

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About