2012
DOI: 10.1021/es304668s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction to Enhanced Reduction of Fe(II)EDTA-NO/Fe(III)EDTA in NOx Scrubber Solution Using a Three-Dimensional Biofilm-Electrode Reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it remained unclear how much Fe(III)EDTA reduction it achieved based on the current data. On the other hand, microorganism‐mediated bioelectrochemical reaction could also lead to Fe(III)EDTA reduction and this pathway might be predominant in this system for Fe(III)EDTA reduction, evidenced by the detection of abundant potential iron‐reducing bacteria (Fig. S2) and relatively low oxidability of Fe(III)EDTA at neutral pH .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it remained unclear how much Fe(III)EDTA reduction it achieved based on the current data. On the other hand, microorganism‐mediated bioelectrochemical reaction could also lead to Fe(III)EDTA reduction and this pathway might be predominant in this system for Fe(III)EDTA reduction, evidenced by the detection of abundant potential iron‐reducing bacteria (Fig. S2) and relatively low oxidability of Fe(III)EDTA at neutral pH .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, the first pathways are preferred due to their complete production of free Fe(II)EDTA from Fe(II)EDTA‐NO. In terms of Equation (8), actually, Fe(II)EDTA has been demonstrated to be an electron donor for bioreduction of Fe(II)EDTA‐NO . When Fe(II)EDTA acted as electron donor, the removal of Fe(II)EDTA‐NO would be at the cost of increasing Fe(III)EDTA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, sulfite and sulfide have direct toxic effects on the iron-reducing bacteria which consequently inhibit the bioreduction of Fe(III)EDTA [8,12,15]. In this study, there were no significant changes in Fe(II)EDTA concentrations with varying SO 2 concentrations, which might be attributed to the combined result of a toxic effect on the bioreduction of Fe(III)EDTA and a promotion effect of chemical reduc- tion of Fe(III)EDTA by the sulfur-containing compounds (e.g., sulfide).…”
Section: Effect Of O 2 Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers focused on isolating and fostering highly efficient bacteria [9,10], whereas others explored new bioreactors [11]. Zhou et al [12] developed a three-dimensional biofilm-electrode reactor (3D-BER) to enhance the bioreduction of Fe(II)EDTA-NO and Fe(III)EDTA. The 3D-BER presented much higher reduction rate and removal loading than normal bioreduction and BER.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system has obtained high SO 2 removal efficiency [6], but it is not for NOx because 90% of NO X in typical flue gas is NO that is insoluble in water. Some methods have been tried to enhance NO absorption, including the utilization of oxidants to oxidize NO to NO 2 and the addition of various iron(II) chelates to coordinate and activate NO [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. But none of these methods have been applied commercially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%