2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00498-023-00355-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction to: Relative genericity of controllability and stabilizability for differential-algebraic systems

Abstract: The reasoning in Step (iv).4 in the proof of [1, Prop. 2.6] is erroneous: In line 4 of the step, we say "The induction assumption implies that …"; however, this does notInstead of fixing the error and proving (1) directly, we show Proposition 2 which is the ever so slightly more general result encompassing (1) and which might be worth knowing in its own right.For the formulation of our result, we need to define some matrix actions and some sets related to the Gaussian algorithm of elementary row operations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have derived criteria for (relative) genericity of observability for linear timeinvariant differential-algebraic systems and in particular for port-Hamiltonian descriptor systems. This extends on the one hand the well-known genericity of observability of linear time-invariant ordinary differential equations [15] to DAEs, and on the other hand the (relative) genericity of controllability of unstructured [5][6][7] and port-Hamiltonian DAEs [8] to observability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…We have derived criteria for (relative) genericity of observability for linear timeinvariant differential-algebraic systems and in particular for port-Hamiltonian descriptor systems. This extends on the one hand the well-known genericity of observability of linear time-invariant ordinary differential equations [15] to DAEs, and on the other hand the (relative) genericity of controllability of unstructured [5][6][7] and port-Hamiltonian DAEs [8] to observability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The definition of "relative genericity" and other notions can be found in [1]. Before proving Proposition 2, we show that Step (iv).4 in the proof of [1, Prop.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…
The reasoning in Step (iv).4 in the proof of [1, Prop. 2.6] is erroneous: In line 4 of the step, we say "The induction assumption implies that …"; however, this does notInstead of fixing the error and proving (1) directly, we show Proposition 2 which is the ever so slightly more general result encompassing (1) and which might be worth knowing in its own right.For the formulation of our result, we need to define some matrix actions and some sets related to the Gaussian algorithm of elementary row operations.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation