2018
DOI: 10.4258/hir.2018.24.3.250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction: Using Statistical and Machine Learning Methods to Evaluate the Prognostic Accuracy of SIRS and qSOFA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, machine-learning-based artificial intelligence has been successfully applied in the medical field and has shown promising results in predicting complications [17][18][19]. Machinelearning approaches can be classified into two main types: unsupervised learning for unlabeled data and supervised learning for labeled data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, machine-learning-based artificial intelligence has been successfully applied in the medical field and has shown promising results in predicting complications [17][18][19]. Machinelearning approaches can be classified into two main types: unsupervised learning for unlabeled data and supervised learning for labeled data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, machine-learning-based artificial intelligence has been successfully applied in the medical field and has shown promising results in predicting complications [17][18][19]. Machinelearning approaches can be classified into two main types: unsupervised learning for unlabeled data and supervised learning for labeled data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, machine-learning-based artificial intelligence has been successfully applied in the medical field and has shown promising results in predicting complications [17][18][19]. Machinelearning approaches can be classified into two main types: unsupervised learning for unlabeled data and supervised learning for labeled data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%