1969
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(69)90974-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrections to the ft-values of 0+ → 0+ superallowed β-decays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
2

Year Published

1975
1975
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1. The available estimates of the isospin impurity correction 6cl as a function of the nuclear charge Z of the daughter nuclei than those by Damgaard [9]; the difference increases with Z, and reaches 16~ for 5~Co. However, the value 6~=0.47~o for 54Co reported in [12] is still 24~ larger than the value 6~1=0.38~o obtained by Lane and Mekjian [11].…”
Section: Microscopic Calculations Of 6~mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1. The available estimates of the isospin impurity correction 6cl as a function of the nuclear charge Z of the daughter nuclei than those by Damgaard [9]; the difference increases with Z, and reaches 16~ for 5~Co. However, the value 6~=0.47~o for 54Co reported in [12] is still 24~ larger than the value 6~1=0.38~o obtained by Lane and Mekjian [11].…”
Section: Microscopic Calculations Of 6~mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The first model was proposed in 1969 by Damgaard [4] and was improved eight years later by Towner et al [15]. The idea is that the proton involved in beta decay has a different radial wave function than the neutron into which it transforms because it is influenced by the Coulomb interaction with all 065501-2 the other protons in the nucleus.…”
Section: A Damgaard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3]. However, there are a growing number of alternative choices [4][5][6][7][8][9] available for one of the two correction terms-the one that accounts for isospin symmetry breaking-including a set we offer ourselves [1]. There has also been a claim, albeit unsupported by any detailed computations, that our calculations neglect a radial excitation term, which is purported to be important [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we concentrate on the isospin-breaking (ISB) corrections δ C , which were already computed by various authors, using a diverse set of nuclear models [2,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. The standard in this field has been set by Towner and Hardy (HT) [2] who used the nuclear shellmodel to account for the configuration mixing effect, and the mean-field (MF) approach to account for a radial mismatch of proton and neutron single-particle (s.p.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%