Corrective Feedback, Negotiation of Meaning and Grammar Development: Learner-Learner and Learner-Native Speaker Interaction in ESL

Kawaguchi, Shoichiro; Ma, Yuan

doi:10.4236/ojml.2012.22008

Cited by 14 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As is shown in the above studies, the major trend of the studies concerning interaction is from the overall effects of interaction (Gass &Varonis, 1994;Mackey, 1999;Li, 2012;Bagheri et al, 2012;etc) to some specific language development such as grammatical development (Braidi, 1995), recasts (Philp, 2003), task types and grouping in interaction (Kawaguchi & Ma, 2012). Participants were among college students, with only a few with middle school students (Hu, 2012).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…In addition, Kawaguchi and Ma's (2012) study also attempted to probe into the effect of interaction on learners' grammatical development. More comprehensive than other studies, this study began with the task-based interaction between traditional native-nonnative interaction (native English speakers and second language learners), as well as interaction between second language learners (with one group of same proficiency level and the other different).…”

Section: Effects Of Interaction On Specific Language Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Review on Effects of Interaction on Learners’ Language Production

Li¹

2014

WJEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article first reviews and then evaluates the findings of research on Language production from the perspective of interaction. Meanwhile, the rich evidence that previous studies both in China and foreign countries have provided is summarized to show the overall effects of interaction on language output, the specific language development under interaction, as well as efficient grouping types by way of interaction. The major research trend on interaction is thus concluded. Moreover, some recommendations for future research in this field are brought forward according to the literature and the particular teaching and learning context in China.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Effects Of Interaction On Specific Language Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review on Effects of Interaction on Learners’ Language Production

Li¹

2014

WJEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Before doing the task, the researcher instructed the student to help their friend who faced the problem by giving correction. Kawaguchi (2012) claimed that the purpose of providing such corrective instruction was to draw L2 learners' attention to their non-target like production and assist their L2 learning. From the result, it could be concluded that many students in this research ignored the researcher's instruction to be aware of the mistake.…”

Section: a "No No No I Don't Like The Action And I Don't Like Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

Negotiation of Meaning: Students’ Awareness of Their Mistakes in Using English for the Secondary School Level

Ulrica

2020

JORLE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In traditional classes, teachers teach grammar in a deductive way with meaningless activities. The activities do not emphasize the uses of English in real life and lack of communication among teachers and students. Language awareness might give the students a challenge to pose questions and encourage them to explore themselves on how language works. The teachers might be able to encourage the students to participate to lead them to get communicative skills by using negotiation of meaning. This article is intended to explore and analyze the students’ mistakes when negotiating meaning in the language learning process. The qualitative descriptive research was employed in this study with 33 students in senior high school as the subjects of the research. The data were from the students’ interviews and recordings. The finding revealed that the students produced mistakes in grammar, pronunciation, and vocabulary. It showed that the extent of the students’ awareness in responding to a mistake in the negotiation of meaning was low. It was only 16 incorrect utterances that might be corrected by the students. It was divided into two sides, willingness and unwillingness to correct. Factors were affecting the students not to be aware during interaction such as focusing on meaning, the same proficiency level, and condition of the class.

show abstract

“…The study of Kawaguchi & Ma (2012), attempted to probe the effect of interaction on learners' grammatical development. The study began with the task-based interaction between traditional native-nonnative interaction, as well as interaction between second language learners themselves, where corrective feedback and negotiation of meaning were taken into consideration.…”

Section: Studies On Foreigner Talk In Classroom Settingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do Modification And Interaction Work? – A Critical Review Of Literature On The Role Of Foreigner Talk In Second Language Acquisition

Dela¹,

C.²

2016

JELT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTIONThe concept that highlights the adjustments native speakers employ in conversations has been mentioned in literary works of long time ago such as in C.S. Lewis' novel, Out of the Silent Planet. It was then Charles Ferguson who coined the term "foreigner talk" in 1969. He defined FT as one of the varieties of simplified speech which is used by native speakers when talking to foreigners. Foreigner talk is commonly regarded in a given speech community as an imitation of the way foreigners speak the language under certain conditions, and it is usually elicited more readily by asking for this kind of imitation than by asking the informant how he would speak to a foreigner (Ferguson, 1975).What makes foreigner talk a simplified speech is a question on the quality of input native speakers provide for the nonnative interactor. Such phenomenon requires certain modifications intended to make the conversation simple and easy to comprehend on the part of the Nonnative Speaker. Hence, when speaking to NNSs (Nonnative Speakers), the NSs (Native Speakers) may speak more slowly, pronounce every word clearly, and use short sentences and basic vocabulary. Research has to guarantee, therefore, that foreigner talk or linguistic simplicity, amounts to cognitive simplicity, or the question of how FT aids comprehension of nonnative hearers must be made clear.According to Ellis (2009), the characteristics of foreigner talk are very similar to those found in other simplified registers such as learner language, caretaker talk, and pidgins. This suggests that FT reflects universal processes of simplification, knowledge of which constitutes part of a speaker's linguistic competence. On a relative note, Hatch (1983) considered three ways in describing foreigner talk;(1) regression (native speakers move back through the stages of development that characterized their own ABSTRACT This critical review of literature provides a detailed description of foreigner talk as a simplified register and critically discusses findings entrenched in studies done about this SLA issue. The studies cited are classified as researches concerning foreigner talk that occurs in both natural and classroom settings. Based on the critical review, more research investigations have to be done to enrich the area of foreigner talk in second language acquisition and learning. The most important consideration is the need to conduct more researches that would validate both the positive and negative effects of foreigner talk in the process of acquiring and learning a second language as well as a foreign language like English. The emergence of significant concerns on the study of FT is also highlighted in this presentation which include how researchers regarded the effectiveness of both input modifications and interactional adjustments along with the occurrence of negotiation of meaning and the use of communication strategies in the SLA process. The paper also presents empirical data on the effectiveness of NNS-NNS interactions in second language learning in contras...

show abstract

Corrective Feedback, Negotiation of Meaning and Grammar Development: Learner-Learner and Learner-Native Speaker Interaction in ESL

Cited by 14 publications

References 36 publications

Review on Effects of Interaction on Learners’ Language Production

Review on Effects of Interaction on Learners’ Language Production

Negotiation of Meaning: Students’ Awareness of Their Mistakes in Using English for the Secondary School Level

Do Modification And Interaction Work? – A Critical Review Of Literature On The Role Of Foreigner Talk In Second Language Acquisition

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About