2011
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlated evolution of transcription factors and their binding sites

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are many layers of gene regulation that exist between DNA sequence data and expressed proteins, emphasis is often placed on the mechanisms that regulate transcription. There has been much work characterizing the coevolution of transcription factors and their DNA binding elements [8]. However, less is known concerning the evolution of post-transcriptional regulatory elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are many layers of gene regulation that exist between DNA sequence data and expressed proteins, emphasis is often placed on the mechanisms that regulate transcription. There has been much work characterizing the coevolution of transcription factors and their DNA binding elements [8]. However, less is known concerning the evolution of post-transcriptional regulatory elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteins binding to such regions are called Transcription Factors (TFs) and the binding sites are called Transcription Factor Binding Sites (TFBS). Interactions amongst TFs and TFBSs regulate the transcription of genes differentially on various developmental stages and tissue types [54]. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput DNA Sequencing (ChIP-Seq) has been widely used to detect TF-DNA interactions [55].…”
Section: Interactomics and Epigenomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our TF-TFBS binding subtype discovery distinguishes itself from the studies from several aspects:

The previous studies focus on a small number (3–4) of specific TF families. Our study is general and large scale on the whole TRANSFAC database (across all possible families) and produces more biologically interesting case studies and novel results.

More importantly, although the previous studies rely on known TF domain information, which may be limited [mainly around 10–20 samples per dataset in (22)], we work on computationally discovered approximate associated TF-TFBS patterns without requiring such annotations. The associated patterns are more conserved, facilitating more convenient analysis than degenerate aligned patterns.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More importantly, although the previous studies rely on known TF domain information, which may be limited [mainly around 10–20 samples per dataset in (22)], we work on computationally discovered approximate associated TF-TFBS patterns without requiring such annotations. The associated patterns are more conserved, facilitating more convenient analysis than degenerate aligned patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%