2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.92.022339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation-based entanglement criterion in bipartite multiboson systems

Abstract: We describe a criterion for the detection of entanglement between two multi-boson systems. The criterion is based on calculating correlations of Gell-Mann matrices with a fixed boson number on each subsystem. This applies naturally to systems such as two entangled spinor Bose-Einstein condensates. We apply our criterion to several experimentally motivated examples, such as an S z S z entangled BECs, ac Stark shift induced two-mode squeezed BECs, and photons under parametric down conversion. We find that entang… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consequences of Definition 5 have been sudied by several authors [155,156,120,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166], and applied in particular to condensed matter systems [167,168,169,170,171] The motivation for this formulation of particle-entanglement originates from a rather specific physical setting requiring information transmission from a system of identical particles to a quantum register made of distinguishable qubits, usually described by tensor products of single-particle Hilbert spaces with fixed numbers of particles in suitably chosen subgroups. This condition on one hand confirms that the locality criterion underlying entanglement-III is also related to the particle picture as in Definition 2 and, on the other hand, that it can be implemented by selecting degrees of freedom and corresponding observables associated with the confinement of individual particle states to orthogonal subspaces, say V 1 and V 2 , of the single-particle Hilbert space.…”
Section: Definition 5 (Entanglement-iiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequences of Definition 5 have been sudied by several authors [155,156,120,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166], and applied in particular to condensed matter systems [167,168,169,170,171] The motivation for this formulation of particle-entanglement originates from a rather specific physical setting requiring information transmission from a system of identical particles to a quantum register made of distinguishable qubits, usually described by tensor products of single-particle Hilbert spaces with fixed numbers of particles in suitably chosen subgroups. This condition on one hand confirms that the locality criterion underlying entanglement-III is also related to the particle picture as in Definition 2 and, on the other hand, that it can be implemented by selecting degrees of freedom and corresponding observables associated with the confinement of individual particle states to orthogonal subspaces, say V 1 and V 2 , of the single-particle Hilbert space.…”
Section: Definition 5 (Entanglement-iiimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we will use the introduced formalism for a reconsideration of the so called geometrical criteria for entanglement introduced in [13] and further developed in a series of works [8][9][10][11][12]. All the criteria of this type are based on an entanglement identifier (7) generated by the map G which is linear (34) and which fulfills the following condition:…”
Section: A Linear Geometrical Entanglement Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been an attempt to generalize this approach for detection of genuine multipartite entanglement [4][5][6][7], however no general construction of such criteria, which would be optimal for arbitrary state exists. The second group of entanglement indicators involves so called geometric criteria [8][9][10][11][12], which in the simplest bipartite case read [13]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to check the entanglement condition (2), we put the correlation tensor of a state (5) in a Schmidt form itself. The general form of the tensor elements is given in Appendix C. Note that the Schmidt form of the state (5) does not imply a diagonal form of the corresponding tensor. Even for a two-qutrit state non-diagonal elements appear.…”
Section: Basic Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we analyze noise resistance of violation of Bell-type inequalities for the bipartite quantum states (5). To this end, we employ the CGLMP inequality in- troduced in Ref.…”
Section: Testing Entanglement With Bell Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%