Correlation Between Center of Pressure Measures Driven from Wii Balance Board and Force Platform

Zakeri, Ladan; Jamebozorgi, Ali Asghar; Kahlaee, Amir Hossein

doi:10.5812/asjsm.55436

Cited by 5 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This could be related to the fact that the HBS has a much narrower surface than the BTG or KIS (26.5 cm versus 68.5 cm and 50 cm), and its plastic shell being less rigid [30]. The over-estimation of the HBS is consistent with the results of previous studies [5,7,32–35] and appears to be a typical feature of uniaxial force plates [6]. It cannot be safely explained why the BTG underestimates the COP data.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

“…A two-way, random-effects, single measure intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC (2,1)) model was used to assess reliability and concurrent validity. Point estimates of the ICCs were interpreted as follows: poor (0–0.39), moderate (0.40–0.74), good (0.75–0.89) and excellent (0.90–1) [5].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…the Romberg-test or the Berg’s balance test for PC assessment and the jump and reach test for VJP. They show to provide valuable information, but suffer from limitations including subjectivity of scores and the ceiling effect and may thus not differentiate subtle changes [5]. Detailed evaluation of PC or VJP and associated strategies require the use of instrumented tests with several materials to enable kinetic, kinematic, and electrophysiological analysis [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparative analysis of postural control and vertical jump performance between three different measurement devices

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to examine the concurrent validity of the HUMAC Balance System (HBS) and Balance Trainer BTG4 (BTG) in comparison to a laboratory-grade force platform (FP) for postural control (PC) and vertical jump performance (VJP) assessment. In addition, reliability of the three devices was measured for PC.MethodsOverall 22 participants (age = 37.8 ± 13.3 years; gender = 9 male, 13 female; height = 174.1 ± 10.5 cm; body mass = 75.3 ± 17.6 kg) were recruited to participate. Double and single leg standing balance tests with eyes open or closed and counter movement jumps (CMJ) were performed on two separate occasions. Reliability and concurrent validity for COP parameters and VJP were examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman plots (BAP), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC).ResultsCOP path length test-retest reliability was predominantly good to excellent for all three devices (ICC = 0.80–0.95). SEM and MDC values were high for all plates (SEM% = 8.0–15.2; MDC% = 22.8–44.5), with the HBS MDC values higher than the KIS and BTG in three of the four trials. ICC scores for concurrent validity were good to excellent for the BTG (ICC = 0.76–0.93) and moderate to good for the HBS (0.49–0.83). Band-Altman plots revealed a systematic bias for the HBS towards higher COP path length values under all conditions and for the BTG in two out of four trials towards lower values. Validity of VJP was excellent for the BTG (ICC = 1.0) and poor for the HBS (0.34), with a systematic bias towards lower values.ConclusionThe comparative analysis of PC and VJP revealed reliable and valid results for the BTG in comparison to a laboratory-grade force plate. The HBS showed reliable results for PC assessment with restrictions regarding its validity. Results of VJP showed that the HBS revealed deficits in the assessment of activities that require rapid, high force movements such as jumping and running. Due to the variable results of all three devices, it is recommended not to use them interchangeably.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparative analysis of postural control and vertical jump performance between three different measurement devices

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This indicated no significant bias between the measurements with SBAP from different sessions. Additionally, the values of the average COP displacement and velocity were consistent between sessions and was in a similar range to those from studies which evaluated the postural control performance during standing with the WBB and a laboratory-grade force platform [ 16 , 19 , 20 , 25 , 34 ], eventhough there were some discrepancies in testing parameters when compared to this study. Therefore, it could be stated that the developed low-cost posturography in this study had enough reliability for assessing postural stability control performance during standing.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

“…Exercise interventions have been utilized and suggested as an effective strategy to recover postural stability control performance [ 12 – 14 ]. Besides effective treatment, the assessment of postural stability control performance is also important, as it helps the clinician to monitor the progression of treatment and to establish an appropriate goal for postural stability control rehabilitation [ 15 , 16 ]. Additionally, postural stability control assessments are suggested to be routinely applied to screen the elderly for early detection of a risk of falling [ 17 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Test-Retest Reliability of Low-Cost Posturography for Assessing Postural Stability Control Performance during Standing

Heamawatanachai

Wiriyasakunphan

Srisupornkornkool

et al. 2021

Journal of Aging Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Postural stability control performance assessment is necessary in providing important information for individuals who are at risk of falling or who have balance impairment. Instrumented assessment is suggested as a valid and reliable test, but the cost and the difficulty of setup are significant limitations. The aim of this cross-sectional (test-retest reliability) study was to develop and determine the reliability of a low-cost posturography for assessing postural stability control performance during standing. The low-cost posturography was developed with four load cells and an acrylic platform. The center of pressure (COP) displacement and velocity were analyzed using written software. Test-retest reliability was performed with six different standing postural stability tests in twenty healthy volunteers on two different days. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), coefficient of variation (CV), and Bland–Altman plot and limits of agreements (LOA) were used for analyses. The low-cost posturography was accurate (ICC = 0.99, p < 0.001 ; SEM = 0.003 cm) when compared to the true with calculated X and Y coordinates, with a moderate to excellent test-retest reliability for both COP displacement (ICCs ranged 0.62–0.91, p < 0.05 ; SEMs ranged 17.92–25.77%) and COP velocity (ICCs ranged 0.62–0.91, p < 0.05 ; SEMs ranged 18.09–27.69%) in all standing postural stability tests. Bland–Altman plots and LOAs suggested good agreement of tested parameters from the developed low-cost posturography between different days. In conclusion, the developed low-cost posturography had adequate reliability for assessing COP displacement and velocity during standing postural control stability performance tests.

show abstract

The Use of a Low-Cost Gaming Platform as a Substitute to Medical-Grade Force Plate in Objective Evaluation of Balance

Singh¹,

Datta

Singh

2021

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Correlation Between Center of Pressure Measures Driven from Wii Balance Board and Force Platform

Cited by 5 publications

References 17 publications

Comparative analysis of postural control and vertical jump performance between three different measurement devices

Comparative analysis of postural control and vertical jump performance between three different measurement devices

Test-Retest Reliability of Low-Cost Posturography for Assessing Postural Stability Control Performance during Standing

The Use of a Low-Cost Gaming Platform as a Substitute to Medical-Grade Force Plate in Objective Evaluation of Balance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About