2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between cerebral reorganization and motor recovery after subcortical infarcts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
183
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
16
183
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence that reorganization in the adult brain can even involve the formation of new neural connections [28] [29]. Therefore, understanding the brain's ability to reorganize itself dynamically can help the scientists understand how human sometimes recover brain functions damaged by injury or disease [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that reorganization in the adult brain can even involve the formation of new neural connections [28] [29]. Therefore, understanding the brain's ability to reorganize itself dynamically can help the scientists understand how human sometimes recover brain functions damaged by injury or disease [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings correlated positively with one index of motor recovery, the hand score of the motricity index. 56 Taken together, these neuroimaging studies suggest that activation in ipsilesional motor areas plays an important role in the recovery process. Neurophysiological studies showed that transient disruption of activity in the ipsilesional M1 and dorsal premotor cortex of patients with chronic stroke and good motor recovery caused clear transient deficits in motor performance of the paretic hand.…”
Section: Activity In the Ipsilesional Hemispherementioning
confidence: 91%
“…59,60 The magnitude of contralesional activation appears to decrease in M1 at 3 to 6 months, relative to 1 week after the stroke, 60,32 but the intensity of contralesional M1 activity does not correlate with the degree of recovery. 56 This finding might indicate that contralesional activation is not functionally relevant for recovery, 56 or that it is insufficient to compensate for a marked motor deficit.…”
Section: Activity In the Contralesional Hemispherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies of passive ankle dorsiflexion will determine if this paradigm can substitute for voluntary movement in subjects who cannot dorsiflex the ankle. Passive movement has shown some potential in several other neuroimaging studies (Loubinoux et al, 2003;Reddy et al, 2002) with significant correlations between dynamic sensorimotor activations for hand function in bilateral inferior BA 40 and continued gains.…”
Section: Locomotor Training-induced Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%