Background: Weight-loss programs for dogs are often hampered by increased begging and scavenging behavior that ensues when food intake is restricted.Hypothesis: A diet formulated to contain a high content of both protein and fiber is more satiating than diets that contain only high fiber or high protein.Animals: Six entire female adult dogs (2 Shetland Sheepdogs, 2 Brittany Spaniels, 2 Labrador Retrievers) participated in the satiety studies; 105 adult female dogs of various breeds and ages were used for the palatability studies.Methods Voluntary food intake was measured in 5 sequential crossover studies, and palatability was assessed with food preference tests.Results: Protein digestibility was significantly lower for HF (mean 6 SD; 77.7% 6 2.52%) than for both HPHF (81.1% 6 0.96%) and HP (81.1% 6 1.65%) (P , .001). Short-term food intake (food ingested when offered for 15 minutes every hour for 4 hours) was lower for HPHF than for both HP and HF (P 5 .038). Medium-term intake (food ingested when offered 3 hours after first meal) was lower for both HPHF (27 6 22.2 kcal/kg 0.73 ) and HF (41 6 6.8 kcal/kg 0.73 ) than for HP (57 6 18.8 kcal/kg 0.73 ) (P 5 .041). Voluntary food intake 3 hours after feeding a restricted meal (25% daily maintenance energy requirements) was significantly lower on the HPHF diet than on either the HP (251%, P 5 .0051) or HF (247%, P 5 .014) diets. However, there was no significant difference between the energy intake on the HP and HF diets (7%, P 5 .37). The HPHF and HP diets had equivalent palatability, and both were more palatable than the HF diet (P , .001).Conclusions and Clinical Importance: The HPHF diet had a satiating effect as evidenced by reduced voluntary intake compared with HP and HF diets, and has the potential to lead to greater compliance in weight-loss programs.