2012
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2012.2221163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation Between Electrode-Tissue Impedance and Motion Artifact in Biopotential Recordings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second suggestion was to use an injection signal for continuous impedance measurement [5], [16]. This technique is already used in conventional ECG measurement systems with gel or dry electrodes, e.g., in [17]. However, it has only recently been proposed for ECG measurement systems with capacitively coupled electrodes.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second suggestion was to use an injection signal for continuous impedance measurement [5], [16]. This technique is already used in conventional ECG measurement systems with gel or dry electrodes, e.g., in [17]. However, it has only recently been proposed for ECG measurement systems with capacitively coupled electrodes.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Current injection technique is discussed previously [24]. This approach implants DC current with chopped-phase to an AC bridge-based comparison circuit.…”
Section: Introduction and Current Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the frequency of MA is overlapped with AECG signal, the ordinary filter cannot remove MA without distorting AECG signal [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses a reference signal (RS) which is uncorrelated with the original signal (OS), but correlated with the noise signal. Several reports have indicated that electrodes tissue impedance (ETI) has strong correlation with MA [2,5]. The adaptive searching algorithm will adjust the filter parameter to obtain AF's output, which is the optimum estimation of the real noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%