Temperature treatment of magnetic Mn-Zn ferrites with the composition Mn 0.6 Zn 0.2 Fe 2.2 O 4 up to 1100 °C results in a tremendous enhancement of the saturation magnetization by more than 60%. Employing a robust combined Rietveld refinement of powder X-ray and neutron diffraction (PXRD and NPD) data, it is revealed how a reordering of the cations takes place during the annealing step, the extent of which depends on the annealing temperature. While Zn(II) exclusively occupies tetrahedral sites throughout the whole temperature range, as the annealing temperature increases up to 700 °C, the Mn(II) cation distribution shifts from 80(7)% of the total Mn content occupying the octahedral sites (partly inverse spinel)to Mn only being present on the tetrahedral sites (normal spinel). Above 700 °C, pronounced crystallite growth is observed, followed by an increase of the saturation magnetization. Complementary techniques such as energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) confirm an even cation distribution and the particle growth with annealing temperature. The structural changes caused by annealing of spinel ferrites directly alter the magnetic properties of the materials, thus serving as an easy handle for enhancing their magnetic properties.values typically ranging between 23 and 85 Am 2 kg -1 . [15][16][17] The wide range of values in the literature can be attributed to modifications of microstructure and cation distribution. Despite these characteristics being key to explaining the differences in the magnetic performance of Mn-Zn substituted spinel ferrites, there is a general lack of investigations addressing the microstructure and cation distribution. This is partly because the cation distribution effect is particularly difficult to unravel in the case of neighboring atoms in the periodic table when using laboratory X-rays or a standard synchrotron experiment. Even though powder Xray diffraction (PXRD) allows modeling the site occupancies of all cations in the crystallographic structure, the reliability of a model is compromised when elements are in the vicinity of each other in the periodic table. This is a challenge in complex spinel ferrites, as the transition metals have a similar number of electrons and therefore similar atomic form factors, e.g. Mn (Z = 25) and Fe (Z = 26). A way to circumvent this is to collect neutron powder diffraction (NPD) data. When using NPD, strong contrasts between cations can be achievable, as the scattering lengths vary erratically with atomic number, e.g. Mn (b Mn = -3.73 fm) and Fe (b Fe = 9.45 fm). This facilitates modeling the cation distribution in spinel ferrites reliably.The cation distribution of a sample depends on the crystal field stabilization energies of the individual cations, their charge and their ionic radius. 18 Annealing can introduce changes in the cation distribution.However, not only the heating step is decisive in modifying the cation distribution, but also the cooling procedure is crucial in controlling it and ther...