2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2004.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between temporal response of fMRI and fast reaction time in a language task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Low sampling rate (Goebel et al, 2003;Deshpande et al, 2010) and variable HRF latency across different brain regions (David et al, 2008) are two often-cited factors for concern. For the first concern, fMRI onset latencies have been shown to correlate well with reaction time and stimulus presentation time (Liu et al, 2004) and can be used to determine the origin of processing delays during cognitive or perceptual tasks with a temporal accuracy of tens of milliseconds (Menon et al, 1998). When applied to simulated fMRI data generated by convolving HRF with local field potentials recorded from the macaque (Deshpande et al, 2010), Granger causality is found to be able to detect delays as short as several hundred milliseconds.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low sampling rate (Goebel et al, 2003;Deshpande et al, 2010) and variable HRF latency across different brain regions (David et al, 2008) are two often-cited factors for concern. For the first concern, fMRI onset latencies have been shown to correlate well with reaction time and stimulus presentation time (Liu et al, 2004) and can be used to determine the origin of processing delays during cognitive or perceptual tasks with a temporal accuracy of tens of milliseconds (Menon et al, 1998). When applied to simulated fMRI data generated by convolving HRF with local field potentials recorded from the macaque (Deshpande et al, 2010), Granger causality is found to be able to detect delays as short as several hundred milliseconds.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis has been little explored physiologically. Voluntary motor response decisions are usually thought to be triggered primarily in frontal "executive" brain areas, including orbitofrontal cortex (Liu et al, 2004), medial prefrontal cortex, and posterior, central, and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (Naito et al, 2000;Mesulam et al, 2001;Ullsperger and von Cramon, 2003). Although a few functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have reported correlations between single-trial blood-oxygen level dependant (BOLD) signal changes and RTs in frontopolar and anterior cingulate cortex (Naito et al, 2000;Mesulam et al, 2001;Liu et al, 2004), the slow time course and poor time resolution of BOLD signals makes it difficult to determine whether the concerned brain activity precedes or follows the motor response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All this may lay a basis to suggest that using any criteria, individually and blindly, is not enough for constructing an effective automatic procedure for selecting the regularization parameter, and that additional information or a mixture of techniques would probably be required. The shape of the fMRI response has been previously found to be of separate interest as its temporal characteristics were demonstrated to correlate with the behavioral measures of cognitive tasks [5,6]. The FDA smoothing techniques allow temporal features of the hemodynamic response, such as the width or the onset time, to be easily computed for possible correlation with task accuracy and reaction time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%