2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between the 1-hour and 24-hour pad test in the assessment of male patients with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There seems to be a noticeable difference in rates depending on the pad test used. This coincides with a previous study conducted by Soto et al, 19 where the discrepancy in continence rates depended on whether it was measured with the 1-or 24-hour pad test; a higher percentage of continence was observed for the 1-hour pad test. However, this fact would not alter the significant differences found between the study groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There seems to be a noticeable difference in rates depending on the pad test used. This coincides with a previous study conducted by Soto et al, 19 where the discrepancy in continence rates depended on whether it was measured with the 1-or 24-hour pad test; a higher percentage of continence was observed for the 1-hour pad test. However, this fact would not alter the significant differences found between the study groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…12 However, the reliability and reproducibility of this test have been questioned, as the short duration tests are restricted to experimental situations on urethral insufficiency, offering a limited impression of daily urinary loss situations. 13 The longer duration tests (24-, 48-, and 72-h) seem to be more reproducible, but with lower patient compliance. 14 In the long duration tests, patients are exposed to daily life situations that might increase intra-abdominal pressure or provoke urgency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Studies show a low correlation between the urodynamic examination results and the 24‐h pad test results 16 . The results of comparing the 1‐ and 24‐h protocols showed a good correlation (0.86) but poor agreement (Cohen's κ coefficient = 0.25) in UI severity classification 13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations