2018
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/125/1/012114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between ultrafiltration rate and phase angle measured by BIA in chronic kidney disease patients on regular hemodialysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…as represented (by 76.9%) of mild to moderate malnutrition, (23.1%) had severe malnutrition, and there was no one had well-nourished according to SGA score. But in the study by Ivan R., et al, (33), the distribution of a total number of 52 patients with renal diseases according to SGA was (53.9%) mild to moderate malnutrition, (11.5%) had severe malnutrition, and (34.6%) had well nourished. While in the study of Chandrashish C., et al, (29), the distribution of 31 renal diseases ( out of 500) elderly participants according to SGA was (48%) were well nourished, (52%) had mild to moderate malnutrition, and the result was extremely different with the result of the present study, the difference in the study sampling could explain this difference Cardiac patients, who were (13%) had no statistical significance with nutrition status according to SGA (P=0.235).…”
Section: Figure (1)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…as represented (by 76.9%) of mild to moderate malnutrition, (23.1%) had severe malnutrition, and there was no one had well-nourished according to SGA score. But in the study by Ivan R., et al, (33), the distribution of a total number of 52 patients with renal diseases according to SGA was (53.9%) mild to moderate malnutrition, (11.5%) had severe malnutrition, and (34.6%) had well nourished. While in the study of Chandrashish C., et al, (29), the distribution of 31 renal diseases ( out of 500) elderly participants according to SGA was (48%) were well nourished, (52%) had mild to moderate malnutrition, and the result was extremely different with the result of the present study, the difference in the study sampling could explain this difference Cardiac patients, who were (13%) had no statistical significance with nutrition status according to SGA (P=0.235).…”
Section: Figure (1)mentioning
confidence: 91%