1986
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/19/9/005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation factor, velocity autocorrelation function and frequency-dependent tracer diffusion coefficient

Abstract: Abstract. The correlation factor, defined as the ratio between the tracer diffusion coefficient in lattice gases and the diffusion coefficient for a corresponding uncorrelated random walk, is known to assume a very simple form under certain conditions. A simple derivation of this is given with the aid of the Green-Kubo formula for the tracer diffusion coefficient and it is generalised to a frequency-dependent correlation factor. The application to lattice gases with nearly vanishing vacancy concentration is cr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…39 To estimate Li mobility, the diffusion coefficient has been calculated from the AIMD-obtained autocorrelation function (see eq 10 of the Supporting Information), as shown in Table 3. 40 The diffusion coefficients are in line with those measured using cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and galvanostatic intermittent titration measurements (ranging from ∼10 −13 to ∼10 −12 cm 2 /s) and calculated by kinetic Monte Carlo calculations (1.38 × 10 −13 cm 2 /s) and within the range of values calculated by AIMD (4.92 × 10 −14 and 1.05 × 10 −11 cm 2 /s). 41−43 The diffusion coefficient of Li + decreases with an increase in lithium concentration, indicating that diffusion becomes increasingly hindered as the electrode becomes more lithiated due to the scarcity of available interstitial sites near full capacity.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…39 To estimate Li mobility, the diffusion coefficient has been calculated from the AIMD-obtained autocorrelation function (see eq 10 of the Supporting Information), as shown in Table 3. 40 The diffusion coefficients are in line with those measured using cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and galvanostatic intermittent titration measurements (ranging from ∼10 −13 to ∼10 −12 cm 2 /s) and calculated by kinetic Monte Carlo calculations (1.38 × 10 −13 cm 2 /s) and within the range of values calculated by AIMD (4.92 × 10 −14 and 1.05 × 10 −11 cm 2 /s). 41−43 The diffusion coefficient of Li + decreases with an increase in lithium concentration, indicating that diffusion becomes increasingly hindered as the electrode becomes more lithiated due to the scarcity of available interstitial sites near full capacity.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Furthermore, it is reasonable to expect that the site-approximation estimate, D tr (site) = D 0 (1 − X 0 ), for SFD from (5) provides an upper bound on all D tr (j,j + 1), and in particular on D tr (max) = max D tr (j,j + 1) = D tr (1,2). The factor 1 − X 0 simply reflects blocking of hopping by empty sites, but this formulation neglects any "back-correlation" in diffusion which generally produces lower values of D tr [32]. In fact, for large L, we find that…”
Section: Generalized Tracer Diffusivity For Sfdmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…6 (2) where the inverse Laplace transform ~(t) of ~(s) is defined as the probability density for an actual random walk as defined above, but with an absorbing boundary at p~ = 0 and with starting point p = a~ at time 0, to first arrive at p=-a~ at time t. 4 In analogy to (I.3), ~ can be expressed as with …”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%