2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of ICG lymphography and lymphoscintigraphy severity stage in secondary upper limb lymphedema

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the ADB staging system, scoring was performed based on the posterior aspect rather than the anterior aspect of the upper limb because the posterior aspect depends on gravity more than the anterior aspect, thus allowing ICG to spread more widely and making the extended area of the dermal backflow more visible. Additionally, in our previous study, the lymphoscintigraphy severity stage [22] was more positively correlated with the ADB stage of the posterior aspect than that of the anterior aspect [23]. Therefore, scoring was performed based on the posterior aspect rather than the anterior aspect in this study to obtain a more accurate evaluation of dermal backflow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Using the ADB staging system, scoring was performed based on the posterior aspect rather than the anterior aspect of the upper limb because the posterior aspect depends on gravity more than the anterior aspect, thus allowing ICG to spread more widely and making the extended area of the dermal backflow more visible. Additionally, in our previous study, the lymphoscintigraphy severity stage [22] was more positively correlated with the ADB stage of the posterior aspect than that of the anterior aspect [23]. Therefore, scoring was performed based on the posterior aspect rather than the anterior aspect in this study to obtain a more accurate evaluation of dermal backflow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Lipectomy was performed for patients with modified MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) stage 4 or higher, Arm Dermal Backflow (ADB) stage 4 or higher, and universal ICG stage 3 or higher. [14][15][16] The circumferences of both extremities were measured before surgery and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. ICG dye was injected into the first and third webspaces at the time, the patient visited the outpatient clinic before surgery.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the recent innovations, surgical debulking continues to be the mainstay of management in advanced class 3 lymphedema (with fibrosis and warty or ulcerous skin changes), filarial lymphedema and when microvascular facilities are unavailable. [3] Several modifications of the original Charles procedure of supra-fascial excisions and skin grafting have been described. Van der Walt et al applied negative pressure wound therapy on the wound bed to improve skin graft take.…”
Section: Surgical Debulking Of Lymphedemamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] Lymphedema is divided into stages 0-5 using indo cyanine green (ICG) lymphography, based on the patency of lymphatic vessels, dermal backflow, and lymphatic vessel contractility. [3] The International Society of Lymphology (ISL) staging charts the progress and reversibility of lymphedematous changes from subclinical disease in stage 0 to irreversible lymphostatic elephantiasis in stage 3 [Figure 1]. [3,4] With the progression of the disease, the microvascular networks that nourish the collecting lymphatic vessels are lost; the lymphatic vessel lumen is dilated with an increase in endolymphatic pressure in the ectasis type, whereas in contraction and the sclerosis types, an increase in smooth muscles and collagen fibers make the lymphatics more thickened and prominent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation