1994
DOI: 10.1248/cpb.42.1525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients with Capacity Factors Measured by Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the traditional shake-flask method for determination of partition coefficients is time consuming, laborious, and requires relatively large amounts of pure and stable compounds. Thus, several indirect methods for determination of octanol-water partition have been used, e.g., reversed-phase HPLC [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], MEKC [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], and microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography (MEEKC) [21,[24][25][26] allowing linear free energy relationships between retention factors, k, and the partition coefficient, P, to be established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the traditional shake-flask method for determination of partition coefficients is time consuming, laborious, and requires relatively large amounts of pure and stable compounds. Thus, several indirect methods for determination of octanol-water partition have been used, e.g., reversed-phase HPLC [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], MEKC [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], and microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography (MEEKC) [21,[24][25][26] allowing linear free energy relationships between retention factors, k, and the partition coefficient, P, to be established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the capacity factors were transformed into the partition coefficients between water and octanol. This was carried out by calibrating log k to the log P OW scale in the particular systems by the use of measured log k of reference substances with known P OW [26,30,[33][34][35][36]. We name the values for the analytes derived by calibration log P, in contrast to log P OW , the literature values, the data directly measured after partitioning between water and octanol (see Section 2), and those obtained from calculation by the computer program.…”
Section: Capacity Factor and Log P Owmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Data for log P OW are taken from [26,[33][34][35][36]. r, linear correlation coefficient for log k i vs. log P OW .…”
Section: Capacity Factor and Log P Owmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more negative DG8 is, the more the equilibrium is moved to the micelle side (strong interaction with the micelles). Depending on the chemical structure of the drugs and the vehicles, various chemical interactions additional to hydrophobic interactions, such as dipole interaction and hydrogen bonding, may occur between them in the partitioning process [14][15][16]22,37]. For the micellar systems where hydrophobic interactions play an important role in influencing the migration and selectivity of drugs, one may expect a linear relationship between the logarithm of the capacity factor, the partition coefficient and the logarithm of the n-octanol/water partition coefficient.…”
Section: Interactions Between Drugs and Micellesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, electrostatic interaction and hydrogen bonding effects between solutes and surfactant were observed (14). The characterization of the hydrophobicity/ hydrophilicity of solutes in micelles was evaluated by electrokinetic chromatography (EKC) [15,16]. Microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography [MEEKC] was investigated by Watarai [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%