2018
DOI: 10.1667/rr14936.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Radiation Dose Estimates by DIC with the METREPOL Hematological Classes of Disease Severity

Abstract: The degree of severity of hematologic acute radiation syndrome (HARS) may vary across the range of radiation doses, such that dose alone may be a less reliable predictor of clinical course. We sought to elucidate the relationship between absorbed dose and risk of clinically relevant HARS in humans. We used the database SEARCH (System for Evaluation and Archiving of Radiation Accidents based on Case Histories), which contains the histories of radiation accident victims. From 153 cases we extracted data on dose … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher exposure levels (2–4 Gy) exhibit increased severity of the above symptoms and onset of hematopoietic syndrome and the associated lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and granulopenia. 7 This exposure range poses an important point of ARS, as possible mortality could be prevented with proper supportive care (i.e., cytokine therapy), and high throughput dose estimates could aid in defining medical treatments. Another critical parameter is time of assessment after exposure, since casualties will probably arrive for triage and assessment at varying times after exposures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher exposure levels (2–4 Gy) exhibit increased severity of the above symptoms and onset of hematopoietic syndrome and the associated lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and granulopenia. 7 This exposure range poses an important point of ARS, as possible mortality could be prevented with proper supportive care (i.e., cytokine therapy), and high throughput dose estimates could aid in defining medical treatments. Another critical parameter is time of assessment after exposure, since casualties will probably arrive for triage and assessment at varying times after exposures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 7.2 Gy TBI, NHPs without supportive care will experience approximately 70% mortality within 60 days (LD 70/60 ), while 6.5 Gy exposure will elicit 50% mortality within 60 days (LD 50/60 ) (±10%). In addition to differences in overall mortality, severe hematologic (hematopoietic) acute radiation syndrome (HARS) is present in the 7.2 Gy cohort (H3) and a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation would be needed for human subjects (~4.2 Gy compared to NHPs at 7.2 Gy) while cytokine therapy would be recommended in the 6.5 Gy irradiated cohort (H2) (13). We found temporal fluctuations of compounds within 96 h postirradiation at 7.2 Gy exposure and higher fold changes of perturbed metabolites at 7.2 Gy compared to 6.5 Gy at 24 h postirradiation, which highlights the importance of biofluid collection timing for successful interpretation of serum metabolic profiles in assigning levels of absorbed radiation dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship of dose with acute effects requires further delineation. Recently, our group examined the relationship of dose to different H-ARS severity degrees using an archive comprising radiation accident case histories (9). All individuals received whole-body exposures (single exposures predominated) and individuals were drugtreated, which challenges a comparison with the LD 50/60 (not considering treatment) mentioned above.…”
Section: Retrospective Dosimetry: a Challenging Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%