The degree of severity of hematologic acute radiation syndrome (HARS) may vary across the range of radiation doses, such that dose alone may be a less reliable predictor of clinical course. We sought to elucidate the relationship between absorbed dose and risk of clinically relevant HARS in humans. We used the database SEARCH (System for Evaluation and Archiving of Radiation Accidents based on Case Histories), which contains the histories of radiation accident victims. From 153 cases we extracted data on dose estimates using the dicentric assay to measure individual biological dosimetry. The data were analyzed according to the corresponding hematological response categories of clinical significance (H1-4). These categories are derived from the medical treatment protocols for radiation accident victims (METREPOL) and represent the clinical outcome of HARS based on severity categories ranging from 1-4. In addition, the category H0 represents a post-exposure hematological response that is within the normal range for nonexposed individuals. Age at exposure, gender and ethnicity were considered as potential confounders in unconditional cumulative logistic regression analysis. In most cases, victims were Caucasian (82.4%) and male (92.8%), who originated from either the Chernobyl (69.3%) or Goiânia (10.5%) accident, and nearly 60% were aged 20-40 years at time of exposure. All individuals were whole-body exposed (mean 3.8 Gy, stdev ±3.1), and single exposures were predominantly reported (79%). Seventy percent of victims in category H0 were exposed to ≤1 Gy, with rapidly decreasing proportions of H0 seen at doses up to 5 Gy. There were few HARS H4 cases reported at exposed dose of 1-2 Gy, while 82% of H4 cases received doses of >5 Gy. HARS H1-3 cases varied among dose ranges from 1-5 Gy. In summary, single whole-body radiation doses <1 Gy and >5 Gy corresponded in general with H0 and H3-4, respectively, and this was consistent with medical expectations. This underlines the usefulness of dose estimates for HARS prediction. However, whole-body doses between 1-5 Gy poorly corresponded to HARS H1-3. The dose range of 1-5 Gy was of limited value for medical decision-making regarding, e.g., hospitalization for H2-3, but not H1 and treatment decisions that differ between H1-3. Also, there were some H0 cases at high doses and H2-4 cases at low doses, thereby challenging an individual recommendation based solely on dose.

This article will familiarize neuroradiologists with the pathophysiology, clinical findings, and standard MR imaging and PET imaging features of multiple forms of dementia as well as new emerging techniques. Cases were compiled from multiple institutions with the goal of improved diagnostic accuracy and improved patient care as well as information about biomarkers on the horizon. Dementia topics addressed include the following: Alzheimer disease, frontotemporal dementia, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, Lewy body dementia, Parkinson disease and Parkinson disease variants, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multisystem atrophy, Huntington disease vascular dementia, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.ABBREVIATIONS: AD ¼ Alzheimer disease; CAA ¼ cerebral amyloid angiopathy; CBD ¼ corticobasilar degeneration; FTD ¼ frontotemporal dementia; LBD ¼ Lewy body dementia; MCI ¼ mild cognitive impairment; MH ¼ microhemorrhages; MSA ¼ multisystem atrophy; PD ¼ Parkinson disease; PSP ¼ progressive supranuclear palsy; rsfMRI ¼ resting-state fMRI

Rapid clinical triage of radiation injury patients is essential for determining appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. We examined the utility of blood cell counts (BCCs) in the first three days postirradiation to predict clinical outcome, specifically for hematologic acute radiation syndrome (HARS). We analyzed BCC test samples from radiation accident victims (n = 135) along with their clinical outcome HARS severity scores (H1-4) using the System for Evaluation and Archiving of Radiation Accidents based on Case Histories (SEARCH) database. Data from nonirradiated individuals (H0, n = 132) were collected from an outpatient facility. We created binary categories for severity scores, i.e., 1 (H0 vs. H1-4), 2 (H0-1 vs. H2-4) and 3 (H0-2 vs. H3-4), to assess the discrimination ability of BCCs using unconditional logistic regression analysis. The test sample contained 454 BCCs from 267 individuals. We validated the discrimination ability on a second independent group comprised of 275 BCCs from 252 individuals originating from SEARCH (HARS 1-4), an outpatient facility (H0) and hospitals (e.g., leukemia patients, H4). Individuals with a score of H0 were easily separated from exposed individuals based on developing lymphopenia and granulocytosis. The separation of H0 and H1-4 became more prominent with increasing hematologic severity scores and time. On day 1, lymphocyte counts were most predictive for discriminating binary categories, followed by granulocytes and thrombocytes. For days 2 and 3, an almost complete separation was achieved when BCCs from different days were combined, supporting the measurement of sequential BCC. We found an almost complete discrimination of H0 vs. irradiated individuals during model validation (negative predictive value, NPV > 94%) for all three days, while the correct prediction of exposed individuals increased from day 1 (positive predictive value, PPV 78-89%) to day 3 (PPV > 90%). The models were unable to provide predictions for 10.9% of the test samples, because the PPVs or NPVs did not reach a 95% likelihood defined as the lower limit for a prediction. We developed a prediction model spreadsheet to provide early and prompt diagnostic predictions and therapeutic recommendations including identification of the worried well, requirement of hospitalization or development of severe hematopoietic syndrome. These results improve the provisional classification of HARS. For the final diagnosis, further procedures (sequential diagnosis, retrospective dosimetry, clinical follow-up, etc.) must be taken into account. Clinical outcome of radiation injury patients can be rapidly predicted within the first three days postirradiation using peripheral BCC.

Research on IPE in distance education lags behind IPE in traditional settings. This study revealed that IPE is attainable in distance education, with significant changes in student's self-efficacy. Self-efficacy is a key indicator of future behavior. [J Nurs Educ. 2018;57(4):225-228.].