2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-016-1090-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) System with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS): Introduction of the Weak Rock Mass Rating System (W-RMR)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14, the calculated width information is a rather accurate estimation, it has the required practical accuracy to allow geologists to evaluate regional rock mass parameters. After all, most of the rock evaluation systems are based on relatively rough estimated ranges, and the evaluation of rock geometry parameters is only one of the many estimations [68,69]. In addition, it must be emphasized that the light and shadow still have a strong influence on the final detection results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14, the calculated width information is a rather accurate estimation, it has the required practical accuracy to allow geologists to evaluate regional rock mass parameters. After all, most of the rock evaluation systems are based on relatively rough estimated ranges, and the evaluation of rock geometry parameters is only one of the many estimations [68,69]. In addition, it must be emphasized that the light and shadow still have a strong influence on the final detection results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between the RMR 76 indicators and Q can be derived from field data and statistical analysis [56][57][58], and can be expressed as…”
Section: Estimation Of Gsi Using Acoustic Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, all the measured MB i values are shown in figure 19. Based on figures 17–19, the ratings of RQD plus joint spacing ( R RQD+JS ) and MB i ( R M ) were calculated, according to [28] and equation (5.1), respectively, as shown in figure 20. This figure shows that for the majority of theoretical DFN models, the R RQD+JS and R M share similar evaluation results, e.g.…”
Section: A Rock Mass Quality Classification System: Rmrmbimentioning
confidence: 99%