1982
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1982.55.3.793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations among Scores on the 1966, 1973, and 1979 Norms of Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices for Economically Disadvantaged Students

Abstract: The correlations between the scores on the 1966, 1973, and 1979 norms on Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices for economically disadvantaged students in Grades 3 to 5 were significantly high. It seems appropriate to use any of the three sets of norms with economically disadvantaged students.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, for economically disadvantaged students, an increasing proportion of whom are Hispanic (Pallas et al, 1989), the SPM (Le., norms for 1966, 1973and 1979 generally seems to be an appropriate nonverbal cognitive measure (Karnes, Lee, & May, 1982). The SPM is also reported to be independent of achievement and ethnicity variables (Powers & Barkan, 1986;Powers et al, 1986).…”
Section: General Cognitive Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Yet, for economically disadvantaged students, an increasing proportion of whom are Hispanic (Pallas et al, 1989), the SPM (Le., norms for 1966, 1973and 1979 generally seems to be an appropriate nonverbal cognitive measure (Karnes, Lee, & May, 1982). The SPM is also reported to be independent of achievement and ethnicity variables (Powers & Barkan, 1986;Powers et al, 1986).…”
Section: General Cognitive Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The RSPM is the most widely used test on five continents (Irvine & Berry, 1988), being suitable from age six to adulthood since it covers a greater cognitive ability variation (Jensen, 1980;Raven, 1941). Orme (1966), Jensen (1980), Karnes et al (1982) consider that the RSPM measure a very fundamental aspect of cognitive performance not influenced by cultural influences. RSPM consists almost entirely of perceiving key features and relationships and discovering the abstract rules that govern the differences among the elements in the matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RSPM can be applied in school contexts, workplaces, and even at home, as well as in the laboratory (Raven et al, 2000). Due to its non-verbal format, the RSPM is used with a broad range of populations for whom language processing is minimized, for example, foreign language groups, the deaf, and also with economically disadvantaged groups (Jensen, 1980;Karnes et al, 1982;Raven et al, 2000). The RSPM has also been used in several cross-cultural studies (Jensen, 1980;Karnes et al, 1982;Kush, 1996;Powers & Barkan, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the test user can still reasonably meet his or her needs by careful, critical appraisal of the tests now available (Hall, 1985: 14). Karnes, Lee and May (1982) investigated the appropriacy of Raven's standard progressive matrices when used with economically disadvantaged students by comparing three sets of Raven's norms via correlational analysis. They concluded (p. 793): 'These data suggest that the 1966, 1973 or 1979 norms can be used with economically disadvantaged students'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%