2002
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2002.8627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations between Surface and Interface Energies with Respect to Crystal Nucleation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
104
2
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
10
104
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The relation (3) shows that tiny spherical crystals can survive above T m up to θ = ε ls , i.e. θ = 0.46 for T 0l /T m = 1/3 and ε ls0 = 1.…”
Section: Main Results Of a Revisited Crystal Nucleation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The relation (3) shows that tiny spherical crystals can survive above T m up to θ = ε ls , i.e. θ = 0.46 for T 0l /T m = 1/3 and ε ls0 = 1.…”
Section: Main Results Of a Revisited Crystal Nucleation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in (9) can be slightly changed for alloys [21]; the viscosity of pure liquid elements is of the order of 0.002 Pa s and of η 0 ; ln(K ls ) is not strongly varying among many liquid elements and is equal to ln A = 90 ± 2 [3,4]. The values of…”
Section: Main Results Of a Revisited Crystal Nucleation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These two quantities have to be the same due to the isotropic character of the liquid structure. This isotropy is obviously broken at the interface, but the diffusion-coefficient profile according to equation (19) is found to be compatible with the three-dimensional diffusivity averaged over the interface region defined in section 3.1. The distribution of dots in figure 4 shows the Ni-diffusion profile in the two-phase layer at T = 1700 K proposed by molecular dynamics simulations.…”
Section: Bulk Properties: Free Energy Density and Diffusion Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 77%