2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10340-012-0444-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations between wireworm damages in potato fields and landscape structure at different scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data (Table ) show that recruitment of wild individuals into a field from the margin is not uniform and this presumably reflects local population differences, at least in the immediate vicinity of the field edges. Because wireworm populations are strongly associated with grass (Parker & Seeney, ; Hermann et al ., ; Milosavljević et al ., ), it might be expected that grass at the field boundaries would drive these differences. This is largely borne out by reference to the descriptions in Table , although we note that the effect is more complex than the proximal presence or absence of grass, and we have also presented evidence for click beetles reaching a field via terrain other than grass, including bare soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data (Table ) show that recruitment of wild individuals into a field from the margin is not uniform and this presumably reflects local population differences, at least in the immediate vicinity of the field edges. Because wireworm populations are strongly associated with grass (Parker & Seeney, ; Hermann et al ., ; Milosavljević et al ., ), it might be expected that grass at the field boundaries would drive these differences. This is largely borne out by reference to the descriptions in Table , although we note that the effect is more complex than the proximal presence or absence of grass, and we have also presented evidence for click beetles reaching a field via terrain other than grass, including bare soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for A. ustulatus , a negative correlation has been observed between spatial distribution of larval population and grass cover [ 104 ]. Another positive correlation is generally found with soil bulk density [ 13 , 96 , 101 , 103 ]. Correlations between soil humidity and infestation rate have also been reported [ 104 , 105 ].…”
Section: From Risk Assessment To Mass Trappingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Crop rotation, availability of food resources through the season, climatic-agronomic features and soil characteristics are the main known factors influencing the composition of species communities and larval population density [ 57 ]. At the local scale, site-specific variables seem to show a positive association with the level of infestation, like grass duration (or surrounding grassy margins and weedy spots) [ 2 , 13 , 96 , 101 , 102 , 103 ]. The presence of meadows and double cropping within the rotation cycles would result in a population increase of species overwintering as adults [ 57 ].…”
Section: From Risk Assessment To Mass Trappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey of A. lineatus and A. obscurus distributions over 950 ha of mixed farmland led to the conclusion that uncropped areas (field margins) were important population sources for invading nearby crops (17). This view has been reinforced in a study that related potato (S. tuberosum) damage caused by wireworms with landscape features and reported a significant correlation with grassy field margins (63).…”
Section: Dispersal and Habitat Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%