2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlative core- to pore-scale imaging of shales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption provides a way of effectively predicting the behaviour of macroscopic variable of the entire volume from the REV. Sometimes, multi-scale imaging is used especially for highly heterogeneous rocks as the smallest pores determine the resolution to be used for optimal imaging (Goral et al 2020). Upscaling has also been used in different researches to circumvent this challenge (Long et al 2016;Piller et al 2014;Mehmani et al 2020).…”
Section: Pore Geometry Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption provides a way of effectively predicting the behaviour of macroscopic variable of the entire volume from the REV. Sometimes, multi-scale imaging is used especially for highly heterogeneous rocks as the smallest pores determine the resolution to be used for optimal imaging (Goral et al 2020). Upscaling has also been used in different researches to circumvent this challenge (Long et al 2016;Piller et al 2014;Mehmani et al 2020).…”
Section: Pore Geometry Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porosity and permeability of shales are often determined by examining core rock samples recovered from oil/gas wells drilled deep into rock formation. Recently, modern 2D/3D imaging techniques, have been used to investigate mineralogy and porosity in very fine detail, down to the sub-nanometer level [1][2][3][4] . These methods (and advanced image analysis) have facilitated characterization of the pore morphology within both the organic matter and non-organic (mineral) matrix of shales [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the limited analytical scales, 3D reconstruction results are sometimes not fully representative of the actual complex and highly heterogeneous structure of rocks. It is therefore necessary to combine X-ray computed tomography and SEM mosaic images for statistical analysis from micron to nanometer scale [ 91 , 92 ]. Therefore, a balance should be found between “resolution” and “analytical scale” during the research of materials such as oil shale.…”
Section: Applications Of the Fib-sem Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%