2023
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04796-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correspondence of functional connectivity gradients across human isocortex, cerebellum, and hippocampus

Abstract: Gradient mapping is an important technique to summarize high dimensional biological features as low dimensional manifold representations in exploring brain structure-function relationships at various levels of the cerebral cortex. While recent studies have characterized the major gradients of functional connectivity in several brain structures using this technique, very few have systematically examined the correspondence of such gradients across structures under a common systems-level framework. Using resting-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 189 publications
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Functional decoding of the four clusters revealed the functional information of the first four components provided. Cluster 1 and 4 were associated with the DMN and the sensorimotor network, consistent with the two ends of the principal gradient (Katsumi et al, 2023; Margulies et al, 2016). Cluster 2 was associated with the frontoparietal network, usually found in the third component (Katsumi et al, 2023; Smallwood et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Functional decoding of the four clusters revealed the functional information of the first four components provided. Cluster 1 and 4 were associated with the DMN and the sensorimotor network, consistent with the two ends of the principal gradient (Katsumi et al, 2023; Margulies et al, 2016). Cluster 2 was associated with the frontoparietal network, usually found in the third component (Katsumi et al, 2023; Smallwood et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Cluster 1 and 4 were associated with the DMN and the sensorimotor network, consistent with the two ends of the principal gradient (Katsumi et al, 2023; Margulies et al, 2016). Cluster 2 was associated with the frontoparietal network, usually found in the third component (Katsumi et al, 2023; Smallwood et al, 2021). Finally, Cluster 3 was associated with the visual cortex, which is usually separated from the sensorimotor network when including the second component (Katsumi et al, 2023; Margulies et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…These gradients were evident in terms of hippocampal-cortical connectivity, hippocampal geometric eigenmodes, and their roles in supporting cortical hierarchies, indicating that the organizational principles are not only evident in how the hippocampus communicates with the neocortex but also in its structural properties and influence on the hierarchical organization of high-order functions. Our results challenge classical views on hippocampal long-axis differentiation, which have predominantly (except 81 ) identified a consistent monotonic gradient across multiple organizational traits 1,2,[4][5][6]24 . We propose that the organization and function of the hippocampus are more complex and nuanced than previously thought.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…We next computed gradient-weighted cortical maps 33 to determine how BF gradients were expressed by the cortex. The gradient-weighted cortical maps were created by multiplying each row of the initial connectivity matrix (M BF voxels x N cortical parcels ) with the corresponding structural principal gradient (sG1) or functional principal gradient (fG1) value to create a gradient-weighted connectivity matrix.…”
Section: Primary Bf Structural and Functional Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 99%