2017
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyx033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum Cohort Profile: The ENVIRonmental influence ON early AGEing (ENVIRONAGE): a birth cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our participation rate was just under 50%, which might result in a not completely representative sample of the target population (e.g. low maternal occupation was 18% in our study population while we expected 26% 49 ). However, we do not expect this to have an impact on the mechanistic associations reported in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our participation rate was just under 50%, which might result in a not completely representative sample of the target population (e.g. low maternal occupation was 18% in our study population while we expected 26% 49 ). However, we do not expect this to have an impact on the mechanistic associations reported in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One of our major strengths is that we were able obtain a wide panel of cardiovascular measurements in 4-to-5-year-olds using a standardized protocol and multiple measurements (five blood pressure assessments, CIMT determined at three different angels and retinal microvascular measures from both eyes). The ENVIRONAGE study is a prospective birth cohort and is transferable to the general population as our study population is at baseline representative of the gestational segment of the population at large 8,50 and at the age of 4 because of the high participation rate (57%) towards follow-up. As with all longitudinal studies we were not able to contact a part of the initial cohort (n = 98), however results are unlikely to be confounded by selection bias; participants and non-participants had similar sociodemographic characteristics such as sex, age, and maternal education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were obtained from the follow-up study of the ENVIRONAGE (ENVIRonmental influence ON early AGEing) birth cohort. This longitudinal cohort has been described in more detail previously 8 . In brief, ENVIRONAGE is a population-based prospective birth cohort study located in Limburg, Belgium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings are generalizable as our study population is representative for the gestational segment of the population at large. 7 Another advantage of our study was the use of acrylamide biomarkers. Biomarkers should not be assumed to always be superior to other methods of acrylamide exposure assessment, such as food frequency questionnaires, because a biomarker may not represent the exposure during the relevant period for disease etiology well, e.g., due to intra-individual variations of exposure in time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further details of the study are reported elsewhere. 7 The analysis described in this paper involved 443 mother-child pairs for which we had acrylamide to hemoglobin adduct measurements in umbilical cord blood and complete covariable data.…”
Section: Study Population and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%