2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2017.03.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum to “Interaction of vasicine with calf thymus DNA: Molecular docking, spectroscopic and differential scanning calorimetric insights” [Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 180 (2017) 217–223]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are widely used in the preparation of many crystalline materials and can effectively control the nucleation and growth process of crystals, and ultimately achieve the regulation of crystal morphology. [61,62] The mechanism of regulation is that the additive can interact with the solute in the liquid phase or selectively adsorb on the crystal surface, affecting the surface energy of the crystal surface and changing the surface growth process, thus causing some crystal surfaces to grow in different directions and ultimately regulating the crystal morphology. [63] Geng and colleagues [37] chose to investigate the effect of various cationic and anionic surfactants on the crystal morphology, in which the use of anionic surfactant Sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS] can obtain products with perfect morphology, uniform size, large aspect ratio, and good dispersion.…”
Section: Additivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are widely used in the preparation of many crystalline materials and can effectively control the nucleation and growth process of crystals, and ultimately achieve the regulation of crystal morphology. [61,62] The mechanism of regulation is that the additive can interact with the solute in the liquid phase or selectively adsorb on the crystal surface, affecting the surface energy of the crystal surface and changing the surface growth process, thus causing some crystal surfaces to grow in different directions and ultimately regulating the crystal morphology. [63] Geng and colleagues [37] chose to investigate the effect of various cationic and anionic surfactants on the crystal morphology, in which the use of anionic surfactant Sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS] can obtain products with perfect morphology, uniform size, large aspect ratio, and good dispersion.…”
Section: Additivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are widely used in the preparation of many crystalline materials and can effectively control the nucleation and growth process of crystals, and ultimately achieve the regulation of crystal morphology. [ 61,62 ] The mechanism of regulation is that the additive can interact with the solute in the liquid phase or selectively adsorb on the crystal surface, affecting the surface energy of the crystal surface and changing the surface growth process, thus causing some crystal surfaces to grow in different directions and ultimately regulating the crystal morphology. [ 63 ]…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Synthesis Of Magnesium Carbonatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative binding assessment of compounds with calf thymus DNA was performed in tris-HCl buffer (0.01 M, pH 7.2). The ratio of absorbance of Ct-DNA in buffer at 260 and 280 nm is concerning 1.9:1 representing that Deoxyribonucleic acid was apparently free from protein contamination [12]. The concentration of DNA in the stock solution was predictable from its absorption intensity at 260 nm using a molar absorption coe cient ε260 = 6600 L mol-1 cm − 1 [13].…”
Section: Dna Binding Experiments Absorption Titrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the above molecular descriptors, compound spectrum is an observable representation of the physicochemical properties of a molecule at the microscopic level, which can be easily accessed with an amazing accuracy using modern spectroscopic technologies [23–26] . Current ML applications of the spectral information in synthetic outcome prediction typically use the experimental or computed chemical shifts of certain sites as local descriptors [27–29] . Although this approach is straightforward and intuitive with considerable interpretability, it requires strong domain knowledge of the molecular structure and the structure‐activity relationship; in addition, this usage of spectral information is incomplete, which discards the information such as shape and absorption intensity of the spectral peaks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%