2016
DOI: 10.1111/let.12136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corroborating trackmaker identification through footprint functional analysis: the case study of Ichniotherium and Dimetropus

Abstract: A study carried out on some excellently preserved footprints has revealed the vital importance of functionality analysis, together with morphological analyses, in settling systematics and attribution issues in ichnological studies. To test the alleged reliability of functionality studies in tetrapod ichnology, a careful analysis of numerous specimens (both trackways and isolated footprints) of the Gotha collection, referred to the Permian ichnotaxa Ichniotherium and Dimetropus, has been carried out. The method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…; Romano et al . ); (2) digit scratches are deeper in the outer part just after the take‐off phase (when scratch is directed outwards), and in the inner part just before the touchdown phase (when scratch is directed inwards), except between the couples V–VII; and (3) the expulsion rims of the tail mark are always at the inner side of the concave parts of the sinusoid, where the trace is steeper. The asymmetric steepness of the expulsion rims inferred from the 3D model (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…; Romano et al . ); (2) digit scratches are deeper in the outer part just after the take‐off phase (when scratch is directed outwards), and in the inner part just before the touchdown phase (when scratch is directed inwards), except between the couples V–VII; and (3) the expulsion rims of the tail mark are always at the inner side of the concave parts of the sinusoid, where the trace is steeper. The asymmetric steepness of the expulsion rims inferred from the 3D model (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…11 and 12). The fleshy pad behind the basipodials actively contacted the ground most likely during the touch-down and weight-bearing phase, as was already inferred from footprint depth of impression in other producers (e.g., Romano, Citton & Nicosia, 2016; Citton et al, 2017). Thus, from a functional standpoint, the autopod posture of the Pentasauropus trackmaker can be regarded as plantiportal ( sensu Michilsens et al, 2009) and it is considered to have been maintained during different gaits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Dimetropus tracks have been found from the middle Moscovian to the middle Kungurian (Tucker & Smith, 2004; Voigt & Lucas, 2015). The trackmakers are considered to have been non-therapsid synapsids (‘pelycosaurs’) such as sphenacodonts, caseids, edaphosaurids, and ophiacodontids (Haubold, 2000; Voigt, 2005; Voigt & Ganzelewski, 2010; Romano, Citton & Nicosia, 2016). …”
Section: Systematic Palaeoichnologymentioning
confidence: 99%