1973
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical and peripheral modification of cerebellar climbing fibre activity arising from cutaneous mechanoreceptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence it appears that the probability of convergence of CF inputs from SI is greater for Purkinje cells having large peripheral receptive fields, than for cells with small receptive fields. The convergence figures for the small receptive fields on the face are in good agreement with those reported by Leicht et al (1973b), who found CF convergence from small areas of hind-limb or forelimb skin, and from the corresponding SI projection, in thirty-four of sixty-four (53 %) of Purkinje cells tested.…”
Section: Ipsilateral VIIsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Hence it appears that the probability of convergence of CF inputs from SI is greater for Purkinje cells having large peripheral receptive fields, than for cells with small receptive fields. The convergence figures for the small receptive fields on the face are in good agreement with those reported by Leicht et al (1973b), who found CF convergence from small areas of hind-limb or forelimb skin, and from the corresponding SI projection, in thirty-four of sixty-four (53 %) of Purkinje cells tested.…”
Section: Ipsilateral VIIsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…By analogy, although not necessarily due to the same mechanism, inhibitory receptive fields of single climbing fibres have been described by Leicht, Rowe & Schmidt (1973). Both observations demonstrate the existence of afferent inhibitory control of transmission in the spino-olivocerebellar pathways and it is an interesting possibility that the movement-related gating is an expression of increased afferent inhibition subserving mechanisms for enhanced spatial contrast.…”
Section: C1ïc3 Versus C2 Recording Sitesmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…6). In both groups there was evidence of peripheral and corticofugal control of the cutaneously evoked CF activity (Leicht et al 1973). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%