A coordinated movement is easy to recognize, but we know little about how it is achieved. In search of the neural basis of coordination, we present a model of spinocerebellar interactions in which the structure-functional organizing principle is a division of the cerebellum into discrete microcomplexes. Each microcomplex is the recipient of a specific motor error signal - that is, a signal that conveys information about an inappropriate movement. These signals are encoded by spinal reflex circuits and conveyed to the cerebellar cortex through climbing fibre afferents. This organization reveals salient features of cerebellar information processing, but also highlights the importance of systems level analysis for a fuller understanding of the neural mechanisms that underlie behaviour.

The function of chronic brain machine interfaces depends on stable electrical contact between neurons and electrodes. A key step in the development of interfaces is therefore to identify implant configurations that minimize adverse long-term tissue reactions. To this end, we here characterized the separate and combined effects of implant size and fixation mode at 6 and 12 weeks post implantation in rat (n = 24) cerebral cortex. Neurons and activated microglia and astrocytes were visualized using NeuN, ED1 and GFAP immunofluorescence microscopy, respectively. The contributions of individual experimental variables to the tissue response were quantified. Implants tethered to the skull caused larger tissue reactions than un-tethered implants. Small diameter (50 µm) implants elicited smaller tissue reactions and resulted in the survival of larger numbers of neurons than did large diameter (200 µm) implants. In addition, tethering resulted in an oval-shaped cavity, with a cross-section area larger than that of the implant itself, and in marked changes in morphology and organization of neurons in the region closest to the tissue interface. Most importantly, for implants that were both large diameter and tethered, glia activation was still ongoing 12 weeks after implantation, as indicated by an increase in GFAP staining between week 6 and 12, while this pattern was not observed for un-tethered, small diameter implants. Our findings therefore clearly indicate that the combined small diameter, un-tethered implants cause the smallest tissue reactions.

The topographical organization of mossy fibre input to the forelimb area of the paravermal C3 zone in cerebellar lobules IV and V was investigated in barbiturate‐anaesthetized cats and compared with the previously described microzonal organization of climbing fibre input to the same part of the cortex. Recordings were made in the Purkinje cell and granule cell layers from single climbing fibre and mossy fibre units, respectively, and the organization of cutaneous receptive fields was assessed for both types of afferents. Based on spatial characteristics, receptive fields of single mossy fibres could be systematized into ten classes and a total of thirty‐two subclasses, mainly in accordance with a scheme previously used for classification of climbing fibres. Different mossy fibres displayed a substantial range of sensitivity to natural peripheral stimulation, responded preferentially to phasic or tonic stimuli and were activated by brushing of hairs or light tapping of the skin. Overall, mossy fibres to any given microzone had receptive fields resembling the climbing fibre receptive field defining that microzone. However, compared with the climbing fibre input, the mossy fibre input had a more intricate topographical organization. Mossy fibres with very similar receptive fields projected to circumscribed cortical regions, with a specific termination not only in the mediolateral, but also in some cases in the rostrocaudal and dorsoventral, dimensions of the zone. On the other hand, mossy fibre units with non‐identical, albeit usually similar, receptive fields were frequently found in the same microelectrode track.

SUMMARY1. The cutaneous receptive fields of 225 climbing fibres projecting to the forelimb area of the C3 zone in the cerebellar anterior lobe were mapped in the pentobarbitoneanaesthetized cat. Responses in climbing fibres were recorded as complex spikes in Purkinje cells.2. A detailed topographical organization of the nociceptive climbing fibre input to the C3 zone was found. In the medial C3 zone climbing fibres with receptive fields covering proximal and/or lateral parts of the forelimb projected most medially. Climbing fibres with receptive fields located more medially on the forelimb projected successively more laterally. The sequence of receptive fields found in the lateral C3 zone was roughly the reverse of that in the medial C3 zone. Climbing fibres with receptive fields restricted to the digits projected preferentially to the caudal part of the forelimb area, whereas those with receptive fields covering both proximal and ventral areas of the forearm projected to more rostral parts.3. The representation of the forelimb was uneven. Receptive fields with a focus on the digits or along the lateral side of the forearm dominated.4. The proximal borders of the receptive fields were located close to joints. The area from which maximal responses were evoked was usually located eccentrically within the receptive field. Based on spatial characteristics the receptive fields could be divided into eight classes, which in turn were tentatively divided into subclasses. Similar subclasses of receptive fields were found in different cats. This classification was further supported by the results of a quantitative analysis of eighty-nine climbing fibres. The receptive fields of these climbing fibres were mapped with standardized noxious stimulation.5. Climbing fibres terminating within sagittal strips (width, 100-300 ,tm; length, > 1 mm) had receptive fields which belonged to the same subclass. There were commonly abrupt changes in receptive fields between such microzones. Most classes of receptive fields were found in both the medial and the lateral parts of the C3 zone. However, receptive fields with a focus on the ventral side of either the metacarpals, the wrist or the forearm were found only in the medial part of the C3 zone.