2023
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1075368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical-brainstem interplay during speech perception in older adults with and without hearing loss

Abstract: IntroductionReal time modulation of brainstem frequency-following responses (FFRs) by online changes in cortical arousal state via the corticofugal (top-down) pathway has been demonstrated previously in young adults and is more prominent in the presence of background noise. FFRs during high cortical arousal states also have a stronger relationship with speech perception. Aging is associated with increased auditory brain responses, which might reflect degraded inhibitory processing within the peripheral and asc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critically, the F0 (indeed all spectral cues) in our stimuli exceeded 250 Hz, which is substantially higher than the phase-locking limits of cortical neurons observed in any animal or human studies using either intracranial or far-field electrophysiological methods (Joris et al 2004;Brugge et al 2009 , showing that speech-FFRs represent categorical information of the speech signal, presumably due to influence of top-down projections to midbrain. The corticofugal influences on FFR seen here are consistent with other studies suggesting that these modulations are strongest at F0, though for unknown reasons (Yellamsetty and Bidelman 2019;Price and Bidelman 2021;Lai et al 2022;Carter and Bidelman 2023;Lai et al 2023). The change in F0 amplitude seen here must be driven by more than merely stimulus acoustics, likely due to top-down changes of FFR, as the acoustic F0 remained the same frequency and intensity across tokens.…”
Section: Category Representations Emerge Subcorticallysupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Critically, the F0 (indeed all spectral cues) in our stimuli exceeded 250 Hz, which is substantially higher than the phase-locking limits of cortical neurons observed in any animal or human studies using either intracranial or far-field electrophysiological methods (Joris et al 2004;Brugge et al 2009 , showing that speech-FFRs represent categorical information of the speech signal, presumably due to influence of top-down projections to midbrain. The corticofugal influences on FFR seen here are consistent with other studies suggesting that these modulations are strongest at F0, though for unknown reasons (Yellamsetty and Bidelman 2019;Price and Bidelman 2021;Lai et al 2022;Carter and Bidelman 2023;Lai et al 2023). The change in F0 amplitude seen here must be driven by more than merely stimulus acoustics, likely due to top-down changes of FFR, as the acoustic F0 remained the same frequency and intensity across tokens.…”
Section: Category Representations Emerge Subcorticallysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Critically, our stimuli require binaural integration to be categorically perceived; listeners cannot arrive at a phonetic label without integrating speech cues from the two ears. The fact FFRs mirrored the behavioral reports supports the notion that FFRs carry information about binaural integration and reflect listeners' online perceptual state (Lai et al 2022;Carter and Bidelman 2023;Lai et al 2023). Early binaural processing in the afferent auditory pathway begins in the superior olivary complex (Goldberg and Brown 1969), a site more caudal to the midbrain IC generators driving most of the FFR.…”
Section: Ffrs Reflect Binaural Integrationsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations