2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical Output Is Gated by Horizontally Projecting Neurons in the Deep Layers

Abstract: Highlights d Simulations predict in vivo responses for major output cell type of the neocortex d Simulations reveal strategy how to test the origins of cortical output empirically d Manipulations confirm that deep-layer corticocortical neurons gate cortical output d Gating of cortical output originates from deep-layer thalamocortical input stratum

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
2
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because we recorded across multiple days during behavior, we did not attempt to recover cell morphology by juxtacellular filling. Thus, we could not differentiate cell types (e.g., thin- versus thick-tufted L5 pyramids, or L6A corticocortical cells [ 46 ]), their projection patterns (e.g., intertelencephalic [IT] versus pyramidal tract [PT]), or the extent to which whisker motion and object location tuning are segregated between these two classes as hypothesized in rat [ 47 ]. Half of object location–tuned units were also tuned to whisker angle during free-whisking, suggesting that these two features may not be cleanly divided between IT and PT cell types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because we recorded across multiple days during behavior, we did not attempt to recover cell morphology by juxtacellular filling. Thus, we could not differentiate cell types (e.g., thin- versus thick-tufted L5 pyramids, or L6A corticocortical cells [ 46 ]), their projection patterns (e.g., intertelencephalic [IT] versus pyramidal tract [PT]), or the extent to which whisker motion and object location tuning are segregated between these two classes as hypothesized in rat [ 47 ]. Half of object location–tuned units were also tuned to whisker angle during free-whisking, suggesting that these two features may not be cleanly divided between IT and PT cell types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brain slice preparations, long-range axonal collaterals of CC and CCla PCs are massively truncated and consequently the length and fieldspan estimates are strongly underestimated (s. e.g. Egger et al 2020). Despite this, the distinct axonal and dendritic properties of the three L6A PC types allow an unambiguous cell type identification.…”
Section: Three Types Of Morphologically and Electrophysiologically DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In rat barrel cortex, layer 6 is the thickest layer and contains the highest number of neurons (Hutsler et al 2005;Meyer et al 2010). Pyramidal cells (PCs) in this layer 6 of the neocortex display a high degree of morphological, electrophysiological and molecular diversity (Zhang and Deschenes 1997;Kumar and Ohana 2008;Thomson 2010;Marx and Feldmeyer 2013;Gouwens et al 2019;Kast et al 2019;Egger et al 2020;Gouwens et al 2020). They project either intra-telencephalically (IT) within the cortex, to the striatum, and the claustrum or extra-telencephalically (ET) to e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is that VPL inputs are notably weak to corticospinal neurons, representing a major subtype of pyramidal-tract type neurons in L5B, whereas VPM inputs to L5B neurons in whisker S1 appear relatively stronger and are implicated in early cortical processing of somatosensory signals (Petreanu et al, 2009;Wimmer et al, 2010;Constantinople and Bruno, 2013;Rah et al, 2013;432 Sermet et al, 2019;Egger et al, 2020).…”
Section: Thalamocortical and Corticocortical Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%