2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corticospinal excitability during observation and imagery of simple and complex hand tasks: Implications for motor rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
93
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
10
93
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results add to the growing body of evidence demonstrating increases in corticospinal excitability during motor imagery and movement observation [e.g. 18,[19][20][21], supporting the theoretical potential for imagery and observation intervention programs to facilitate recovery from conditions such as stroke and traumatic brain injury. As noted in the introduction, the conditions under which patients may benefit from imagery or observational training programs is not yet clearly understood.…”
Section: Mep Findingssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results add to the growing body of evidence demonstrating increases in corticospinal excitability during motor imagery and movement observation [e.g. 18,[19][20][21], supporting the theoretical potential for imagery and observation intervention programs to facilitate recovery from conditions such as stroke and traumatic brain injury. As noted in the introduction, the conditions under which patients may benefit from imagery or observational training programs is not yet clearly understood.…”
Section: Mep Findingssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Recent studies have begun to explore factors that might affect the amplitude of MEPs observed, including task complexity and mode of imagery [20,21], but none have yet considered motor imagery ability. Therefore, in this study, we first measured motor imagery ability using two commonly used techniques -a self-report questionnaire; the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire-2 [22] and the hand rotation task [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…patients watch another person or a video clip of a moving limb. It has been argued that movement observation activates the human mirror neuron system, which consists of neurons responding to both, the overt execution of an action and the observation of that same action performed by somebody else (Ertelt et al, 2007;Gazzola and Keysers, 2009;Iacoboni and Mazziotta, 2007;Pomeroy et al, 2005;Rizzolatti and Sinigaglia, 2010;Roosink and Zijdewind, 2010). Initial evidence suggests that movement observation can also be successfully applied in rehabilitation (Celnik et al, 2008;Ertelt et al, 2007;Stefan et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the majority of this literature investigated only one mode of covert movement mode or, at most, compared two modes, usually motor imagery and observation (Clark et al, 2003;Filimon et al, 2007;Iseki et al, 2008;Lui et al, 2008;Macuga and Frey, 2012;Munzert et al, 2008;Piefke et al, 2009;Roosink and Zijdewind, 2010;Wang et al, 2008). Therefore inferences between studies have to be made when comparison between all modes of covert movement is to be conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, there is converging evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), functional nearinfrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies that complex motor imagery is associated with greater hemodynamic change and higher amplitude motor-evoked potentials than simple motor imagery (e.g., Kuhtz-Buschbeck et al, 2003;Roosink & Zijdewind, 2010;Holper & Wolf, 2011). In the latter studies and in this paper, "complex" motor imagery is defined as tasks that involve sequences of movements (e.g., KuhtzBuschbeck et al, 2003;Roosink & Zijdewind, 2010;Holper & Wolf, 2011), and/or more than one body part (e.g., Holper & Wolf, 2011). Based on these findings, we hypothesized that actions involving more than one body part and more complex action sequences would result in more robust SMRs and, consequently, higher classification accuracy than traditional SMR-based BCI imagery tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%