2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CoSe nanoparticles prepared by the microwave-assisted polyol method as an alcohol and formic acid tolerant oxygen reduction catalyst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 However, the formic acid crossover still significantly limits the performance of DFAFCs. 3,[29][30][31] Formic acid tolerance was measured using Pt and Ru x Se y deposited onto the oxide-carbon composite substrate (TiO 2 /C) in the study conducted by L. Timperman et al 31 The formic acid tolerance was better in the Ru x Se y /C catalyst when compared with that in the Ru x Se y /TiO 2 /C catalyst. 3,[29][30][31] Formic acid tolerance was measured using Pt and Ru x Se y deposited onto the oxide-carbon composite substrate (TiO 2 /C) in the study conducted by L. Timperman et al 31 The formic acid tolerance was better in the Ru x Se y /C catalyst when compared with that in the Ru x Se y /TiO 2 /C catalyst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 However, the formic acid crossover still significantly limits the performance of DFAFCs. 3,[29][30][31] Formic acid tolerance was measured using Pt and Ru x Se y deposited onto the oxide-carbon composite substrate (TiO 2 /C) in the study conducted by L. Timperman et al 31 The formic acid tolerance was better in the Ru x Se y /C catalyst when compared with that in the Ru x Se y /TiO 2 /C catalyst. 3,[29][30][31] Formic acid tolerance was measured using Pt and Ru x Se y deposited onto the oxide-carbon composite substrate (TiO 2 /C) in the study conducted by L. Timperman et al 31 The formic acid tolerance was better in the Ru x Se y /C catalyst when compared with that in the Ru x Se y /TiO 2 /C catalyst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three emerging technologies rely on a common reaction, the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), which generally requires a catalyst to improve its sluggish reaction kinetics. Fe and Co) have been extensively investigated, including transition metal oxides, 15,16 chalcogenides, 17,18 and bio-inspired organometallic complexes. However, the scarcity, high cost, and vulnerability to poisoning of Pt have strongly hindered the practical application of Pt-based catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The onset potential of 0.823 V for ORR could be attained in H2SO4 solutions with CoSe/C synthesized through microwave assisted routes [16], while the ORR potentials of 0.6-0.7 V and the electron transfer numbers of 3.1 Oxygen reduction reaction 4.0 could be obtained for CoSe2/C prepared with the Se/Co ratios of 2.5-4.0 [17]. In addition, CoSe2 nanoparticles showed a higher ORR activity in KOH than in H2SO4 solutions and a higher tolerance to methanol as compared with a commercial 20 wt % Pt/C catalyst [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%