2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coseasonal sublingual immunotherapy reduces the development of asthma in children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
309
0
10

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 445 publications
(326 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
309
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Natural course of allergic disease. Sublingual immunotherapy may also impact the natural course of the disease (1730,1731), but more data are needed for confirmation.…”
Section: Sublingual Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural course of allergic disease. Sublingual immunotherapy may also impact the natural course of the disease (1730,1731), but more data are needed for confirmation.…”
Section: Sublingual Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is yet to be substantiated. Regarding sublingual immunotherapy, some randomized controlled open trials in children have also suggested a preventive asthma effect [85][86][87]. As the quality of pediatric evidence in this area is not optimal, there is a need for well-designed, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies to assess the longterm immunotherapy effects in childhood [88].…”
Section: Allergen-specific Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The safety profile seems not to be different in very young children (7,8). Similarly to injection immunotherapy, the literature would suggest that SLIT is capable of preventing the onset of new sensitizations and of reducing the risk of asthma onset in pediatric patients with allergic rhinitis (9,10). The most recent controlled trials (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16), involving hundreds of subjects, have clearly demonstrated, at least for grass pollen, a clinical efficacy over placebo far greater than the recommended 20% (17), in addition to a dosedependent effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%