2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2021.229141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coseismic (20 July 2017 Bodrum-Kos) and paleoseismic markers of coastal deformations in the Gulf of Gökova, Aegean Sea, SW Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed data were reduced to the MSL, by applying tidal corrections at the time of surveys and calculating the residual sea level, using a tide gauge data set acquired from the nearest Marmaris station (https://tudes.harita.gov.tr). The amplitude of the local tide was ~0.3 m on the southwestern coast of Turkey (Yıldırım et al, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observed data were reduced to the MSL, by applying tidal corrections at the time of surveys and calculating the residual sea level, using a tide gauge data set acquired from the nearest Marmaris station (https://tudes.harita.gov.tr). The amplitude of the local tide was ~0.3 m on the southwestern coast of Turkey (Yıldırım et al, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the data from the archeological sites of Fethiye, Anzidei et al (2011) suggested that the contribution of GIA to RSL changes played a minor role; further, over the last 2300 years, tectonic subsidence contributed significantly to the current topography of the southwestern coast of Turkey. Notably, the geographic position system (GPS) measurements and sea level data acquired from the Bodrum tide gauge (southwestern coast of Turkey) confirmed no significant vertical land motion in the region between 1993 and 2009 (Yildiz et al, 2013), while the GIA was also negligible (Yıldırım et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the so-called northeastsouthwest-trending left-lateral fault zone in the Gökova basin is also named as the GFZ or the Gökova Transfer Fault ( 2019) indicate that the east-west trending south-dipping fault is the source of the 2017 main shock, supported by the GPS data, regional tectonics, aftershocks, and tsunami observations, although the InSAR result ts equally well both north-and southdipping faulting. In a recent study by Yıldırım et al (2022), they reported that the Karaada Islet, located just north of the main shock, was uplifted based on the change of the shorelines and notch levels during the 2017 Bodrum earthquake, and concluded that the earthquake was associated with a south-dipping normal fault.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different opinions about whether the main shock occurred on a south- (Kiratzi and Koskosidi, 2018;Ocakoğlu et al, 2018;Saltogianni et al, 2018;Tiryakioğlu et al, 2018;Papadopoulos et al, 2019;Yıldırım et al, 2022) or north-dipping fault (Karasözen et al, 2018;Ganas et al, 2019;Konca et al, 2019, Sboras et al, 2020. Kiratzi and Koskosidi (2018) suggest that the Bodrum-Kos earthquake ruptured a 50°±9° south-dipping east-west trending normal fault with the dimensions of the 30 km along strike and 15 km along dip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papadopoulos et al (2019) indicate that the east-west trending south-dipping fault is the source of the 2017 main shock, supported by the GPS data, regional tectonics, aftershocks, and tsunami observations, although the InSAR result ts equally well both north-and southdipping faulting. In a recent study by Yıldırım et al (2022), they reported that the Karaada Islet, located just north of the main shock, was uplifted based on the change of the shorelines and notch levels during the 2017 Bodrum-Kos earthquake, and concluded that the earthquake was associated with a southdipping normal fault.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%