2016
DOI: 10.4401/ag-7275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coseismic displacement waveforms for the 2016 August 24 Mw 6.0 Amatrice earthquake (central Italy) carried out from High-Rate GPS data

Abstract: <p>We used High-Rate sampling Global Positioning System (HRGPS) data from 52 permanent stations to retrieve the coseismic dynamic displacements related to the 2016 August 24 <em>M<sub>w</sub></em> 6.0 Amatrice earthquake. The HRGPS position time series (named hereinafter "GPSgrams") were obtained with two different analysis strategies of the raw GPS measurements (Precise Point Positioning [PPP] and Double-Difference [DD] positioning approaches using the Gipsy-Oasis II and the TRAC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the available raw observations provided by GNSS-RING network [81], managed by INGV [82], integrated by other active GNSS stations belonging to regional and national networks [83], in order to estimate the VLM rates at a set of stations located within 10 km from the coastlines of south-eastern Sicily (Figure 2). In our analysis, we considered all the data available from 1995 to 2020, but, specifically, the sites shown in Figure 2 span the 2006-2020 time-interval.…”
Section: Gnss Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the available raw observations provided by GNSS-RING network [81], managed by INGV [82], integrated by other active GNSS stations belonging to regional and national networks [83], in order to estimate the VLM rates at a set of stations located within 10 km from the coastlines of south-eastern Sicily (Figure 2). In our analysis, we considered all the data available from 1995 to 2020, but, specifically, the sites shown in Figure 2 span the 2006-2020 time-interval.…”
Section: Gnss Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the 2016-2017 coseismic sequence in Central Italy has already been studied by GNSS techniques [16,17]. The first authors used High-Rate sampling GNSS data from 52 permanent stations to retrieve the coseismic dynamic displacements, while the second authors, using low-cost GNSS receivers and short-baseline networks, presented a novel record of near-field coseismic displacement that was important for assessing fault displacement of surface ruptures, defining seismic hazard and predicting ground motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis was based on the combined effects caused by vertical components of RSLR and horizontal components of shoreline changes. The V A and V D obtained from the InSAR dataset were calibrated with the GNSS records available for northern Apulia (Figure 4b), provided by the GNSS-RING network [60], managed by INGV, and integrated by other active GNSS stations belonging to regional and national networks [61,62]. GNSS data were processed following the procedures described in a study by Serpelloni et al [63].…”
Section: Modeling Long-term Flooding and Shoreline Retreatmentioning
confidence: 99%