2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/799/2/166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmic Evolution of Dust in Galaxies: Methods and Preliminary Results

Abstract: We investigate the redshift (z) evolution of dust mass and abundance, their dependences on initial conditions of galaxy formation, and physical correlations between dust, gas, and stellar contents at different z based on our original chemodynamical simulations of galaxy formation with dust growth and destruction. In this preliminary investigation, we first determine the reasonable ranges of the most important two parameters for dust evolution, i.e., the timescales of dust growth and destruction, by comparing t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(111 reference statements)
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To balance dust growth at high temperatures and to lower depletions in the diffuse ISM in models MRN3nm and EMRN3nm to the observed level would require an unreasonably short timescale t dest diff of destruction in the diffuse medium in Equation (16). We therefore conclude that the assumption of the maximum coefficient for all temperatures, commonly used in recent hydrodynamical simulations with dust (e.g., Bekki 2015aBekki , 2015bMcKinnon et al 2016), tends to overestimate the dust production rates in hydrodynamic numerical simulations of galactic evolution.…”
Section: Observational Constraints For the Sticking Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To balance dust growth at high temperatures and to lower depletions in the diffuse ISM in models MRN3nm and EMRN3nm to the observed level would require an unreasonably short timescale t dest diff of destruction in the diffuse medium in Equation (16). We therefore conclude that the assumption of the maximum coefficient for all temperatures, commonly used in recent hydrodynamical simulations with dust (e.g., Bekki 2015aBekki , 2015bMcKinnon et al 2016), tends to overestimate the dust production rates in hydrodynamic numerical simulations of galactic evolution.…”
Section: Observational Constraints For the Sticking Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A disadvantage of the model of Bekki (2013) is the current implementation of dust processing in the ISM in which growth and destruction processes do not depend on the local conditions and occur on constant timescales. In subsequentworks, the dependence of the growth timescale on local conditions is included by scaling it with thetemperature and density of the particles (Yozin & Bekki 2014;Bekki 2015a). A new, live dust particle model has been presented by Bekki (2015b), who decoupled the gas and dust particles and implemented additional gas-grain interactions and radiation pressure on grains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to investigate the accretion processes of AGB ejecta and cold ISM, we use our original simulation code (Bekki 2013;Bekki 2015b, c) that can be run on GPU clusters. The code enables us to investigate chemical evolution, dust formation and evolution (Bekki 2013), formation of molecular hydrogen on dust grains (Bekki 2015b), photo-electric heating of gas by dust and star formation in galaxies (Bekki 2015c). Since the details of the code are already given in our previous papers, we just briefly explain the code in the present study.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%