1994
DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/20/4/010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmic ray hadron flux at sea level up to 15 TeV

Abstract: Using a prototype of a large hadron calorimeter, vertical cosmic ray hadrons were recorded and the all-hadron flux was measured in the range from 5 GeV to 10 TeV. Hadron reconstruction and identification are described. We observe a vertical flux of dI/dEh=(1.59+or-0.24)*10-5(Eh/100 GeV)-2.72+or-0.10 (m2 s sr GeV)-1. The flux compares well with values obtained in other experiments. Total inelastic cross sections for protons scattered by nuclei in air are deduced from the unaccompanied hadron flux and compared w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
101
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
101
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Its reliability to reproduce the present data has been checked by comparing its predictions to the measured ratio of hadron fluxes at sea level (KASCADE [36], 1030 g/cm 2 ) and mountain altitude (EAS-TOP, 820 g/cm 2 ). Primary protons and helium nuclei were generated in quasi vertical direction θ ≤ 5 • , with energy spectra according to JACEE and RUNJOB [25,26] and the expected hadron fluxes at each observation level were calculated.…”
Section: The Primary Proton Spectrummentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Its reliability to reproduce the present data has been checked by comparing its predictions to the measured ratio of hadron fluxes at sea level (KASCADE [36], 1030 g/cm 2 ) and mountain altitude (EAS-TOP, 820 g/cm 2 ). Primary protons and helium nuclei were generated in quasi vertical direction θ ≤ 5 • , with energy spectra according to JACEE and RUNJOB [25,26] and the expected hadron fluxes at each observation level were calculated.…”
Section: The Primary Proton Spectrummentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The result of this work is shown in comparison to other experimental results ( [28], [1], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [2], [34]). In addition, the high energy models (QGSJETII.4, QGSJET01, SIBYLL, EPOS-LHC) cross section predictions are also shown by solid line, fine dashed line, dotted line, and dashed line consecutively.…”
Section: Proton-proton Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The result of the proton-air cross section is then compared to the results obtained from various experimental results ( [28], [1], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [2], [34]) Figures 7. In addition, the experimental results of the high energy models (QGSJETII.4, QGSJET01, SIBYLL, EPOS-LHC) cross section predictions are also included. This includes the statistical (outer/thinner error bar) and the systematic (inner/thicker error bar).…”
Section: Proton-air Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The X max -distribution is unbiased by the fiducial geometry selection applied in the range of the fit. Right panel: resulting prod p−air compared to other measurements (see [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] for references) and model predictions. The inner error bars are statistical, while the outer are the sum of statistic and systematic uncertainties in quadrature.…”
Section: Determination Of P−airmentioning
confidence: 99%