2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2211.07865
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COSMOS-Web: An Overview of the JWST Cosmic Origins Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HST-dark galaxy A is unambiguously detected and resolved with JWST though, an important question that remains is whether JWST can detect (see a similar discussion for HST in Dey et al 1999) similarly dusty objects that are unlensed at higher redshift, especially the JWST prospects on dusty galaxies in the Epoch of Reionization (z > 6). To answer this, we compare the best-fit SED model of galaxy A at different redshifts with the depths of major JWST surveys, including UNCOVER (PIs: I. Labbe, R. Bezanson et al 2022), CEERS (PI: S. Finkelstein; Bagley et al 2022) and COSMOS-Web (PIs: J. Kartaltepe, C. Casey et al 2022). At higher redshift, galaxies are less massive and more compact given the mass-size relation (e.g., see van der Wel et al 2014).…”
Section: Detectability At Higher Zmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HST-dark galaxy A is unambiguously detected and resolved with JWST though, an important question that remains is whether JWST can detect (see a similar discussion for HST in Dey et al 1999) similarly dusty objects that are unlensed at higher redshift, especially the JWST prospects on dusty galaxies in the Epoch of Reionization (z > 6). To answer this, we compare the best-fit SED model of galaxy A at different redshifts with the depths of major JWST surveys, including UNCOVER (PIs: I. Labbe, R. Bezanson et al 2022), CEERS (PI: S. Finkelstein; Bagley et al 2022) and COSMOS-Web (PIs: J. Kartaltepe, C. Casey et al 2022). At higher redshift, galaxies are less massive and more compact given the mass-size relation (e.g., see van der Wel et al 2014).…”
Section: Detectability At Higher Zmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mAB > 29), its relatively narrow field of view is not expected to significantly increase survey area compared to past Hubble surveys. Wide-field JWST programs, such as Cycle 1 GO/Treasury program COSMOS-Web (Kartaltepe et al 2021;Casey et al 2022, ∼ 0.60 deg 2 ), will still be able to cover areas that are comparable to a handful of WFI pointings and are therefore an important pathfinder to inform future Roman deep-field survey strategies. Thanks to the excellent launch delivered by ESA and Arianespace that resulted in significant conservation of JWST 's on-board fuel, its expected mission lifespan has been prolonged to upwards of 15 to 20 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative difference in flux between the low-z dusty galaxy SED and the high −z LBG solution for both galaxies is 0.2-0.25 mag in MIRI/F560W and 0.35 in MIRI/F770W. The expected apparent magnitudes in all MIRI bands are 23-24 mag, well above the 5σ sensitivity thresholds of Cycle 1 JWST deep fields with MIRI coverage such as COSMOS-Web and CEERs (Casey et al 2022;Finkelstein et al 2022b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We first normalize the stack to a continuum flux on the order of ∼10 nJy over λ obs = 2-3.5 μm and assume it to be undetected in F115W and F150W. This represents a plausible scenario given the relative filter depths of JWST Cycle 1 extragalactic deep fields (Bagley et al 2022;Casey et al 2022;Finkelstein et al 2022b) and is similar to CEERS-93316 (Donnan et al 2023) and CEERS2_2159 (Finkelstein et al 2022b), a z = 16.4 LBG candidate selected from CEERS (Bagley et al 2022;Finkelstein et al 2022a). CEERS-93316 has a tentative 2.6σ SCUBA-2 detection (Zavala et al 2023) and environmental evidence (Naidu et al 2022b), both indicating a possible lower-redshift solution at z ∼ 4.8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation