Cost Accounting in Public Hospitals in Poland

Abstract

The aim of this article is to assess the cost accounting solutions that are used currently in Polish hospitals. The evaluation covered three main areas that require cost data—management, external reporting and pricing of health services (performed by a regulatory body). The study concerned the costing model that was obligatory for Polish public hospitals in the years 1998–2011 (top-down micro-costing model) and has not yet been replaced by another solution. Different research methods have been used for each of the areas under research, inter alia surveys, direct interviews and case study methods. Empirical results indicate a limited usefulness of the researched costing model in all of the evaluated areas: management, financial reporting and pricing. First, the costing model is used moderately only for the most important management areas, such as planning, control and operational decision making. Second, it does not include the specifics of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) (basic pricing object) and therefore does not allow for accurate determination of their costs. Third, due to lack of the complex costing methodology the model is used in an unstructured and incoherent manner.

The Management Accounting Practices in Healthcare: The Case of Czech Public Hospitals

“…This response rate was above the average response rate usually achieved in management accounting studies (Van der Stede et al, 2005) and met the requirements for the minimum sample size calculated using the Cochran's sample size formula for continuous data and the Cochran's correction formula (Cochran, 1977). The descriptive statistics for costing practices (M1-M5) suggest their importance for the decision-making activity of public hospital management except for ABC (M5) which presents an opportunity for further development as the literature recommend shifting from the traditional costing practices towards more sophisticated approaches, such as ABC (Rauliajtys-Grzybek et al, 2017;Popesko et al, 2015). Scores achieved by budgeting (M6) confirm its dominant role in this environment, as observed also by other studies (King et al, 2010;Smith et al, 2006), and corresponded with the research expectations.…”

Dynamics of the COVID-19 Contagion and Mortality: Country Factors, Social Media, and Market Response Evidence From a Global Panel Analysis

“…The current discussion lacks the overall picture of the economic consequences for the global pandemic. We might expect a broader discussion on fiscal financing [32], health system financing [33], public administration reorganisation [34], the sharing economy, changes in tourist preferences [35], alternative costs of the globalization of the supply chain distortion, chemical industry concentration [36], microeconomic asymmetric shocks to different industry branches e.g. leisure versus respirator manufacturing industry, rapid digitisation of services, and reshaping of innovative work behaviour [37], particularly high school education.…”

Management of Open Innovation in Healthcare for Cost Accounting Using EHR

“…The theories of analysis are based on the methodology of rational administration based on the balance sheet as a useful tool for corporate decision-making and based on information flows distinguished in the three available phases: programming, execution, and control based on microcosting approach [50][51][52].…”