2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost analysis of CO2 transportation: Case study in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gao et al [40] concluded that a higher mass flow rate increases the pipeline diameter, which in turn increases the pipeline capital cost. Some cost models based the investment cost equation only on CO2 flow rate and length of pipeline [48,49].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Gao et al [40] concluded that a higher mass flow rate increases the pipeline diameter, which in turn increases the pipeline capital cost. Some cost models based the investment cost equation only on CO2 flow rate and length of pipeline [48,49].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure drop along a pipeline would be greater for longer pipelines than for shorter ones with similar characteristics. Gao et al [40] concluded that longer pipelines also require larger pipeline diameters thereby increasing the capital and levelised costs. It is therefore desirable to reduce the length of the pipeline as much as possible but this is constrained by the requirements for an optimum route.…”
Section: Pipeline Route Length and Right Of Way (Row)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature there are several models which describe the costs for CO 2 pipelines, divided into five categories: linear models [27], [23], [28], models based on the weight of the pipeline [26], [34], quadratic equations [35], [36], the CMU 180 model [29] and models based on flowrates [30], [7], [5]. All of these models are based on natural gas pipelines cost calculations and assume that the only pure CO 2 will be transported, i.e., the models do not account for the impact of impurities in the CO 2 stream.…”
Section: Cost Calculation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It involves burning coal in nearly pure oxygen. The main advantage of the oxy-fuel CO 2 capture technique is that the flue gas is available at a high CO 2 concentration of approximately 75.7 mol%, thereby reducing compression costs and facilitating efficient CO 2 removal [90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104]. Although this technology appears promising if implemented for CO 2 capture in power plants, its possibility of implementation in the South African coal-fired power plants is quite slim because burning coal in pure oxygen instead of air on a large scale is very expensive.…”
Section: Oxy-fuelmentioning
confidence: 99%